I do agree on the recall comment though. If there's a known fault, a car manufacturer will issue a recall and pay to replace the faulty part with a non-faulty replacement. Whereas all Kalhoff are doing is giving us a new unit with the same fault, thus keeping the time bomb ticking and leaving us to await the inevitable again.
Completely agreed, and the point I made to them when rejecting the bike.
They say they have a software update that reduces the risk of the motor breaking again, but they don't contact their customers and recall existing bikes to install such update, and therefore people will be left stranded miles from home (as it happened to me), or will have their motor break once out of warranty (a £600 repair, with only one repairer: 50 Cycles).
No pro-active resolution whatsoever, which confirm the bad track record they have with aftersales services. However, they still claim they have the best bikes and best service in the UK on their website.
My own experience with them was more like one of the worst experience in aftersales, and I don't seem to be the only one.
I think trading standards will need to have a word with them...again.
Also, my understanding is that the software update reduces the maximum amount of torque applied, meaning that the bike specification is no longer as advertised and sold...
Yet, despite all the points above, they have refused to settle my (reasonable) claim for a partial refund, and therefore this is going to court now.