Buyers Guide

ITSPETEINIT

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 11, 2006
492
0
Mere, Wilts
Sprint v. Torq

BY PETE
I tried my wife's new Sprint 7 with a fresh/new battery (Lithium)
Hi pete
how would you rate the performance of sprint 7 say compaired to the torq which i have i am looking out for a second bike ie is it a good hill climber i think it is a bit more heavy then the torq does it accelerate better then the torq. cheers pete.NIGEL:D
I'll tell you about My Torq and ME first of all:
It's great with the delimiter off - 22 mph on the flat and hill climbing greatly improved, but it uses the juice.
When the battery was new 10 months ago (done 500 miles all told) I got 28 miles along flat roads with gentle, very gentle assistance except for a last massive hill 1 km long about 7% grade - very hard work pedalling, brings me almost to my knees. The bike had not been delimited then.
The riding position for me (see my profile) is a bit too much 'weight on arms' causing 'handlebar palsy' after a few minutes. So I fixed the throttle and made it 'sticky' by freeing the allen key screw and forcing the rubber grip against the end of the h'bar (interior). I can now ride one 'right' handed.
To rest the right hand is easy because no controls are affected.
The front forks are a hell-of-a rough ride. I've messed about with tyre pressures with little respite .

Now the Sprint 7 and ME:
It will only do 15.5 mph so I don't have to look over my shoulder for 'coppers'.
Actually I've caught it out in favourable circumstances (whether wind or down-grade I'm not sure) doing nearly 17 mph (unassisted) with the motor still running.
Up hills it is much easier than the Torq. My nemesis hill 10% or even 11% for 750 metres can be managed without a rest at about 10/11 mph in bottom gear (39 inches - same as the Torq now) so I must be getting more from the motor probably because of the motor's internal gearing. It is still a work out for me but not exhausting, just tiring.
The riding position is much better (built for comfort not for speed). That's because the Head tube is much higher than the Torq and there may yet be a little height adjustment in the Quill type head stem.
Gears are slick on the move or stationary: an advantage in traffic if you have not kept awake to the situation.
If you are a 'foggie' the step through is an added advanatage for those of us who can no longer get their leg over the saddle. My shins are pitted with scars from mounting the Torq.
The suspension is ACE:
I have not had it long enough to have a view of range but after 20 miles and that hill the indicator at stationary was still on green.
Am I convinced? I'm looking for a Sprint 7 to replace my Torq which is for sale again.
If you feel, reading these critiques, you'd like a very good (done less than 500 miles) lightly used Torq 10 months old send me a private message. This one could be set up just right for you with quids worth of extras.

I was surprised that the Torq gave the rider so much assistance when starting on steep hills (that's 1 in 15 - 6.66%, to me): it's off in a flash.
So is the Sprint: much the same.

You can't change the rider's gearing on the Sprint hub without affecting the other end of the range by the same degree (e.g. changing the rear sprocket).
But I have modified the Torq to 44 chainring x 12 to 32 cassette with an Alivio Rear Mech. Just like the Forza/Forte. So the gearing is much the same as the standard Sprint. I need all the help I can get on serious hills and in that respect the Sprint has the edge over the Torq for me bacause of the motor's built in gearing.
If you are a strong biker and can keep it going at 12 mph the Torq night just win it for you on the real hills and on the flat.

Cheers
Peter
 

frank9755

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 19, 2007
1,228
2
London
Buying Guide

Can I be controversial and say that I don't think it is a good use of time to do this? I say that not because I don't think it would be very helpful, but because:
- it would be a lot of work - both the initial project and the task of keeping it up to date
- hard for any one of us to do something objective when we all have our own views and prejudices,
- this board already contains a wealth of rich information on a wide variety of bikes to give a prospective buyer a vivid picture of different alternatives.

When I was interested in researching bikes, I did a search on each model on this board, and got great information with the type of detail that you just never could get in reviews or guides, and would recommend that to anyone else.

I certainly ldon't mean to be negative! I think more useful investments of time would be either better search tools for the site, or a list of 'must read' posts for each type of bike.

Frank
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,314
30,678
I normally like using search tools Frank, but the site seems to have a storage limit on past posts. My posting history shows only 500 posts, eliminating the 1330 posts before that, so all the older posted info from before 30th March seems to have disappeared. :(
.
 

nigel

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 18, 2006
467
0
Nigel

Hi pete
great review many thanks i also own a torq but for me living in hampshire the hills are not to bad so i am quite happy with my speed machine i am sure you will have no problem selling your torq:D
 

electric.mike

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 16, 2007
342
49
grimsby
flecc

I normally like using search tools Frank, but the site seems to have a storage limit on past posts. My posting history shows only 500 posts, eliminating the 1330 posts before that, so all the older posted info from before 30th March seems to have disappeared.
is this due to the cost,is the site being run out of someone's pocket,if so i would rather pay a small fee if that's needed to take us forward, and defiantly rather than see us end up with pop ups for financial support.
perhaps it could be linked to the other thread about members titles- up to 100 posts member after that an option to say send £5 somewhere and be upgraded to associate member,after all most of us have had £5 value.
mike
 

rsscott

Administrator
Staff member
Aug 17, 2006
1,399
196
flecc


is this due to the cost,is the site being run out of someone's pocket,if so i would rather pay a small fee if that's needed to take us forward, and defiantly rather than see us end up with pop ups for financial support.
perhaps it could be linked to the other thread about members titles- up to 100 posts member after that an option to say send £5 somewhere and be upgraded to associate member,after all most of us have had £5 value.
mike
Hi Mike,

the issue Flecc is referring to is either a feature or limit of the vBulletin forum software rather than a cost issue. I'll have a look through the software admininstration to see if I can adjust it. It's a very powerful piece of software and I probably know less than 10% of its features :eek:
 

Beeping-Sleauty

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 12, 2006
410
5
Colchester, Essex
..the issue Flecc is referring to is either a feature or limit of the vBulletin forum software rather than a cost issue. I'll have a look through the software admininstration to see if I can adjust it. It's a very powerful piece of software and I probably know less than 10% of its features :eek:
Hi Russ,
it may be DBX/IDX file storage ceilings, or it may be date bound, if i may be of help, please don't hesitate,

....or , i'll just send the fiver eh...

beeps
 

rsscott

Administrator
Staff member
Aug 17, 2006
1,399
196
Hi Russ,
it may be DBX/IDX file storage ceilings, or it may be date bound, if i may be of help, please don't hesitate,

....or , i'll just send the fiver eh...

beeps
thanks for the offer, luckily it was just a simple change in the admin control panel! I've upped the search results from 500 to 1500 posts. Hopefully it shouldn't impact performance but if it does I may have to reduce it again.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,314
30,678
Don't worry if you have to reduce it again Russ. I'm the only one affected by this at present, and it still leaves my history cut off at 14th December 2006 anyway.
.