Brexit, for once some facts.

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,382
16,880
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
At maybe 5% efficiency! :)
.
The energy needed for the adsorption process concerning the CO2 is very little, it's mainly electrostatic.
the energy needed for charging the battery is recovered later so efficiency in this particular cycle is near 90%-95%.
In the future, they may develop the process without needing the battery.
 

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
Other residues also need to be scrubbed off the exhaust gas before separating CO2.
recovered CO2 can be disposed off where it's more suitable to do so. You can pump it into the soil where it can be digested or freeze it for example.
This method shows us a promissing technique where CO2 can be removed efficiently using a small volume and relatively lightweight equipment. At the moment, your e-cars carry a 200kg-300kg kit to do just that: removing CO2 from the city to release it elsewhere.
Inject it in the soil - and then what happens?
Freeze it - and then what happens?

I know some inejct-into-rock approaches exploit an inherent possibility of chemical combining. But anything else could end up just being a long-winded way of slightly deferring release. Shove down an oil well - then it bubbles up over however many decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flecc

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
Inject it in the soil - and then what happens?
Freeze it - and then what happens?

I know some inejct-into-rock approaches exploit an inherent possibility of chemical combining. But anything else could end up just being a long-winded way of slightly deferring release. Shove down an oil well - then it bubbles up over however many decades.
Grow things ... Lets say timber or bamboo, and store the timber. CO2 gone efficiency about 2% . Oh and make things from the timber .and bambo...like aircraft, buildings, underwater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flecc and Woosh

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
Grow things ... Lets say timber or bamboo, and store the timber. CO2 gone efficiency about 2% . Oh and make things from the timber .and bambo...like aircraft, buildings, underwater.
Managing to incorporate a large proportion of the carbon dioxide is going to be difficult. I know higher carbon dioxide levels can result in higher growth rate. But what percentage can be incorporated without significant loss to the atmosphere (e.g. simply due to greenhouses which leak)?

And you can imagine the ludicrous idea of growing things - especially timber - and then seeing the product sent to Drax to be burned!
 
  • :D
Reactions: flecc

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,382
16,880
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
Inject it in the soil - and then what happens?
Freeze it - and then what happens?
I don't know which is best method to recycle CO2 but we do use CO2 to make fertilisers, building materials and fizzy drinks.
 

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
I don't know which is best method to recycle CO2 but we do use CO2 to make fertilisers, building materials and fizzy drinks.
CO2 is a by-product of making fertilisers, isn't it? That's why there have been CO2 shortages when fertiliser plants are not operating.

Many building materials emit a load of CO2 during manufacture. Cement and the classic, lime, for sure.

And fizzy drinks only hold the CO2 in the bottles/cans until they are opened. Highly transient.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: flecc

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,213
30,611
The energy needed for the adsorption process concerning the CO2 is very little, it's mainly electrostatic.
the energy needed for charging the battery is recovered later so efficiency in this particular cycle is near 90%-95%.
In the future, they may develop the process without needing the battery.
We'll see. I'm a cynic where all new invention announcements are concerned. I doubt one in a thousand ever come to fruition.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zlatan

guerney

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 7, 2021
11,429
3,248
@oyster - I noticed these mushrooms today, growing near a long dead decapitated hazelnut tree - can I safely eat them? Thinking omelette... but not if they're magic...

49105


49106

49107
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,213
30,611
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: oyster

guerney

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 7, 2021
11,429
3,248
Maybe it's Illuminati for "7: You were lucky, 0: Now you're not"? Who the hell knows what really goes on inside Tory leadership hive overlord minds...
 
  • :D
Reactions: oyster

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
No, they are almost certainly The Glistening Inkcap, Coprinellus micaceus. Like all the Ink Cap mushrooms they deliquesce into black ink.

If you want black food, think squid ink which is safe to consume.
.
I will almost never say a fungus is safe to eat. Partly because identification isn't easy and especially so online. (And I know enough to know I am no expert.) But also as in this passage:

From tree stumps or buried wood of broadleaf trees, Coprinus micaceus, formerly known as the Mica Inkcap but now called the Glistening Inkcap, arises in small to medium-sized clumps from spring until early winter. This edible mushroom is potentially poisonous if collected from roadsides or polluted land, where the mycellium can bioaccumulate heavy metals such as cadmium and lead; this results in the mushrooms containing high concentrations of these toxins.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,213
30,611
I will almost never say a fungus is safe to eat. Partly because identification isn't easy and especially so online. (And I know enough to know I am no expert.) But also as in this passage:

From tree stumps or buried wood of broadleaf trees, Coprinus micaceus, formerly known as the Mica Inkcap but now called the Glistening Inkcap, arises in small to medium-sized clumps from spring until early winter. This edible mushroom is potentially poisonous if collected from roadsides or polluted land, where the mycellium can bioaccumulate heavy metals such as cadmium and lead; this results in the mushrooms containing high concentrations of these toxins.
Indeed, both these comments go for all mushrooms. We can say they are not safe to eat from online photos, but can never say they are safe to eat.

The name changes add another danger, that of misidentification. In this case the Coprinus family name has also been superceded, by Coprinellus.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: oyster

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
Managing to incorporate a large proportion of the carbon dioxide is going to be difficult. I know higher carbon dioxide levels can result in higher growth rate. But what percentage can be incorporated without significant loss to the atmosphere (e.g. simply due to greenhouses which leak)?

And you can imagine the ludicrous idea of growing things - especially timber - and then seeing the product sent to Drax to be burned!
Not at all ludicrous. The advantage is that Energy gets stored and then consumed when it makes the best use. But the new difference now is that PV related systems are now more efficient in production
 

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
Not at all ludicrous. The advantage is that Energy gets stored and then consumed when it makes the best use. But the new difference now is that PV related systems are now more efficient in production
It is ludicrous as a way of taking CO2 out of the atmosphere.

It isn't ludicrous as a part of a whole continuing cycle fully thought through and carefully implemented.
 

jonathan.agnew

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 27, 2018
2,400
3,381
I will almost never say a fungus is safe to eat. Partly because identification isn't easy and especially so online. (And I know enough to know I am no expert.) But also as in this passage:

From tree stumps or buried wood of broadleaf trees, Coprinus micaceus, formerly known as the Mica Inkcap but now called the Glistening Inkcap, arises in small to medium-sized clumps from spring until early winter. This edible mushroom is potentially poisonous if collected from roadsides or polluted land, where the mycellium can bioaccumulate heavy metals such as cadmium and lead; this results in the mushrooms containing high concentrations of these toxins.
interesting - wife routinely collects mushrooms in forests in shires (specially autumn, now) - naturally away from roads - but one never know what has been done on land over previous fifty, hundred years
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: guerney

AntonyC

Esteemed Pedelecer
Apr 5, 2022
332
144
Surrey
If you mean the ban coming in 2035, yes it is wise.

Already quite a few who've bought them often don't bother to charge when it's inconvenient, treating them as nearly full time IC cars, and the electric range of most models is very small.

But the real problem from 2035 would be those who buy them only intending to use them as pure ic cars to get around the ban on IC only.
.
Those are behaviour issues and there must be plenty of ways for govt to make this kind of misuse unattractive.

One that I'm thinking of is to regulate towards the norm being a capable 50 mile EV with a small IC engine for occasional use, a bit more than the 40hp it takes to keep a car moving at 70mph. There'd be some variation of course but gross exceptions for private use would be hard to obtain.

These days it takes a 250 mile battery to sell an EV in preference to an IC car, when either is likely to average 20 miles a day. That sets a pattern until at least 2035 and doesn't sound like a convincing low carbon outcome overall.

Would hybrids become acceptable or is this just too controversial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oyster

guerney

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 7, 2021
11,429
3,248
And while the tories fixate on themselves, there's a quite serious mortgage crisis meets recession quietly lurking closer. In USA they argue its inflation rather than debt fuelled and absolutely fine, and different from 2008
I'm not at all convinced that's true in UK. Its overinflated asset prices, again, and unsustainable debt. The fact that the numbers are different is immaterial.
What the hell are Morgan Stanley playing at? It's very different - inflation exacerbated by war.. for as long as it continues. Therefore it isn't "absolutely fine", and won't be for years - even after it ends. The UK is a much smaller kwasier economy, where property prices have been kept high by hook or crook... about 36-42% of all "Wealth" is in property here... people have become somewhat dependant upon it's overinflated value. Has our economy actually recovered from 2008?

It's a MS advert to increase brokerage revenue through diversification of portfolios. The MS TV ad should have been made by the team behind M&S's Christmas campaigns - "This isn't just inflation... this is war inflation," with visuals of tiny mangled cadavers and bloody human body parts being tipped over a slow rising mushroom cloud, using a giant white jug.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: oyster

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
Those are behaviour issues and there must be plenty of ways for govt to make this kind of misuse unattractive.

One that I'm thinking of is to regulate towards the norm being a capable 50 mile EV with a small IC engine for occasional use, a bit more than the 40hp it takes to keep a car moving at 70mph. There'd be some variation of course but gross exceptions for private use would be hard to obtain.

These days it takes a 250 mile battery to sell an EV in preference to an IC car, when either is likely to average 20 miles a day. That sets a pattern until at least 2035 and doesn't sound like a convincing low carbon outcome overall.

Would hybrids become acceptable or is this just too controversial?
Which is where the BMW i3 Range Extender fitted.


But the issues are significant.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: AntonyC and flecc

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales

Advertisers