And no longer all true.It was well done - but a bit old now.
.
And no longer all true.It was well done - but a bit old now.
Well we've got plenty of plant based meats now.This is an amazing breakthrough for Vegan technology
This is not a new idea, pioneered long ago in certain rain forest areas, along with quinine.Well we've got plenty of plant based meats now.
I'm wondering how long it will be before we can have meat based vegetables on our plates.
.
I like starmers plan, it makes more sense than transferring £50 billion from the taxpayer to the bloated profits of commercial banks and energy companiesIt makes at least as much sense as the current other "plans".
But I do think the issue of prepaid meters being made comparable to other tariffs is an important step which they have also put forward. The idea that the "social" subsidy would cover any excess costs of prepaid meters seems quite reasonable. No-one who can really afford anything else remains on prepaid unless they CBA. But some marginal cases stay on prepaid to make sure they don't overspend. A degree of prudence that should be seen as responsibility for oneself and not subject to excess costs.
(I have not gone through any figures to assess value, etc.)
There is undeniably a shortage of workers here in the UK.“cost of leaving crisis” - cost of EU workers leaving after we voted for brexit. 160,000 vacancies in social care, 110,000 in the NHS and a lot in agriculture.
It could have been predicted but at the time but did not get much attention.
Starmer may have to broach the subject eventually.
To me, replacing EU workers with rest of world workers is not a smart move. We have had and are still having a terrible endemic problem with low productivity. Replacing EU workers with those crossing the channel in dinghies is not going to solve that.
MSN
www.msn.com
We are still not training enough doctors and nurses to be self-sufficient in future.“cost of leaving crisis” - cost of EU workers leaving after we voted for brexit. 160,000 vacancies in social care, 110,000 in the NHS and a lot in agriculture.
It could have been predicted but at the time but did not get much attention.
Starmer may have to broach the subject eventually.
To me, replacing EU workers with rest of world workers is not a smart move. We have had and are still having a terrible endemic problem with low productivity. Replacing EU workers with those crossing the channel in dinghies is not going to solve that.
MSN
www.msn.com
They truly get madder by the minute, with even the Civil Service joining in the idiocy.Distraction? Taking the urine?
GPs could prescribe money off energy bills under Treasury plan
Proposal would mean doctors would assess whether patients are struggling enough to require help
GPs could prescribe money off energy bills under Treasury plan
Proposal would mean doctors would assess whether patients are struggling enough to require helpwww.theguardian.com
Under a Truss government, who said patients should be fined for missing appointments and doctors should have their pay cut, and GP appointments can take weeks, and GPs are not in any way qualified to express opinions on affordability, ...
In fairness this is not completely daft, given their experience with Smart Meters. The intention of those was for the people to be able to monitor their usage and be able to reduce it, the government hoping to reduce the need for new power stations.I see the government is leading again with intelligence, sensitivity and logic:
Energy use is a ‘decision for individuals’ insist No 10 and Truss allies
Senior Tories rule out asking households to reduce energy use despite planning for winter blackouts
Thus, if you are well-off, you will be free to use patio heaters, have your house at tropical temperatures, use your swimming pool to boil tatties, recharge your Tesla and drive like a maniac. Open windows if it is a touch warm rather than turn heating down. And not even a tiny little "tut" from the government, nor a "please mister" asking nicely.
Even if it gets to revolving power cuts, as soon as their power comes back on, they can resume excess consumption.
I don't know what type of smart meters are installed, but the obvious value is for demand level pricing. Here in France I am expecting mine to be installed on Thursday. It will allow me to interrogate it from IrelandIn fairness this is not completely daft, given their experience with Smart Meters. The intention of those was for the people to be able to monitor their usage and be able to reduce it, the government hoping to reduce the need for new power stations.
Of course as I predicted that was a daft idea, most already only use what they need to so there has been no saving and the Smart meter scheme has been a stupid waste of over 80 billion pounds.
So having been stung once, it's entirely understandable that the government won't ask the public to save energy again, knowing it wont work.
.
All they do is tell you how much is being used - to varying degrees of accuracy - and over varying periods (hours/days/weeks/months).I don't know what type of smart meters are installed, but the obvious value is for demand level pricing. Here in France I am expecting mine to be installed on Thursday. It will allow me to interrogate it from Ireland
The scheme got off to a bad start with large numbers of meters being installed that were incompatible and couldn't be switched between suppliers. By the time newer meters became available tens of thousands of them had to be changed.I don't know what type of smart meters are installed, but the obvious value is for demand level pricing. Here in France I am expecting mine to be installed on Thursday. It will allow me to interrogate it from Ireland
If they told me it would benefit the country, I'd be happy to run my washing machine at almost any time. And my oven use is also very flexible (but not overnight). Those are the biggest electricity uses I have.The scheme got off to a bad start with large numbers of meters being installed that were incompatible and couldn't be switched between suppliers. By the time newer meters became available tens of thousands of them had to be changed.
Another major failing here is the large number of inoperative smart meters due to inadequate mobile phone coverage. That's true of mine and a large number of my neighbours, the government claims of 95% or more coverage falling far short even here in London. That of course means the hope of the suppliers that meter readers could be dispensed with has failed to materialise. Like many in various parts of the country I still have to feed my meter reading to the supplier every month and have a very occasional meter reader call to check. There's even been some companies set up to collect meter readings for suppliers.
But the biggest failing from the government's point of view is that there has been no reduction in usage, the very thing the government put them in for. They had claimed originally that the scheme would cost £11 billion and save as much due to a reduction in the need for more power stations, but it's now believed to have cost some £80 billions. Think of the generating infrastructure that could have built!
It was a crackpot scheme from beginning to end.
.
She is also threatening to remove BoE's independenceI see Truss is as trussworthy as the lame duck:
Liz Truss has refused to commit to appointing an ethics adviser if she became prime minister, saying she has “always acted with integrity”.
If you check her definition of integrity, I think we have a mis-match with what many of us mean:
Between 2004 and 2005, she had an extra-marital affair with the married MP Mark Field, whom the Conservative Party had appointed as her political mentor.