They aren't being sentenced, they aren't law enforcers like the police and the police clearly aren't interested in that possibility of a covid regulations breach.
It's what you would, increasingly desperately, want us to discuss. And I have heartfelt sympathy with that. If I voted for boris an/or brexit or were conservative I would - literally - do anything to avoid taking about THAT. But you're attempts at denial is beginning to verge on Raab's hysterical gabbling on telly. And its about as effective as comical alis attempts to disguise a glaring sordid reality of corruption no one can unsee anymore.
www.independent.co.uk
it was the Daily Mirror that first reported the story. As it was on the subject of one rule for Tory elite, another for the rest of us, it fell to Angela Rayner's sphere of competence. She duly did her job and asked the police to investigate.
Just because it happened a year ago doesn't mean it should be left alone. There have been many bodies found at least that long after their demise - but someone might well be prosecuted for murder.
That's exactly opposite of my opinion/view.
No, Starmer initiated it. Paper picked it from him. (Starmer made enquiry to police)
you are wrong there. The Daily Mirror broke the story on Tuesday 30 Nov, KS took it to PMQ on Wednesday 01 Dec. Rayner asked Simon Cask to investigate and refer to the police on Thursday 02 Dec.
you are joking, right? The guy is a liability, stop defending him.
This, my friend, is a projection. I'm not talking about parties. That is the tip of an ugly iceberg of conservative corruption. Which is why we are where we are. And something you repeatedly try to avoid recognising as you try to refocus the attention on labour. This would be fine, if it (the state of denial of the electorate from before the brexit vote) wasn't- as it is - the reason why a corrupt elite saw an opportunity to exploit.
How on earth is criticising pointless attacks on him defending Boris. He wants to be accosted on points folk either think are pointless or with absolutely no negative outcomes.
I don't think this is an issue he wants to be attacked on.
Utter rubbish.
That's why police said they wouldn't be following it up.
it is relevant. You want everything to be reduced to simple yes/no but the job of a PM is more than just looking for simple yes/no answers. Johnson is lazy and inept, the country deserves better. He should go.
I actually agree with that now, but having a go at him about a party sure as hell won't bring him down.
that's not a fair comparison. At last PMQ (01-Dec), BJ avoided to answer a simple question (was it true that you guys had a party last year while the country was in lockdown?) with a simple yes/no not because he does not know the answer but because he knows the consequence if he answered yes. Consequence that he should have thought of last year before allowing it. That's the point, he just did not think then it's important but it is now. Johnson is a liability.
Nice analogy. You, however, are utterly (and increasingly) desperate for us to discuss and prosecute the policeman (starmer) instead of the criminal. And as ploys go its a bit too obvious.
I know they are not being sentenced. It was simply to illustrate that our systems do, at times, hold those who hold certain offices to a higher standard, as evidenced by higher sentences for police who are sentenced. Two otherwise very similar cases would probably see a police officer given a higher sentence because they committed the crime while obligated by their oath to uphold the law.
