It's amusing to look back at the flak I took for saying that we should stick to the manufacturers second vaccination period.
I was accused of many things, the most memorable being that much more eminent people than I said it was OK
Who was I to judge?
And yet here we are with the CEO of Pfizer coming out with the same message I did and for the same reason, there is no supporting evidence to support what we are doing.
Sure the government can rustle up some half baked local research groups that didn't invest $4 Billion in developing the Vaccine, and get a tame local Eminence to declare it valid.
Why has the CEO of Pfizer broken ranks on this?
We waived their liability to get ahead with the race
The rest of the world didn't
He really doesn't want what our idiots are doing to become a world wide fashion for two reasons
1:Less profitable
2:Imagine the catastrophic consequences in law suit costs for the corporation if things go wrong in countries that haven't absolved Pfizer of all liability?
So much for the validity of our Eminent experts, they can be wrong, or worse influenced by the likes of Cummings and Johnson's latest fancy.