well if you do pi$$ on the floor and dont have a medical reason why you done it for no valid reason id imo you will get a few years in prison for a act of terrorBut not in a job centre.
well if you do pi$$ on the floor and dont have a medical reason why you done it for no valid reason id imo you will get a few years in prison for a act of terrorBut not in a job centre.
Refer back to my comments at the time... Ireland had gone into lockdown before Cheltenham. The Irish Italian Rugby match had been cancelled, and the St Patrick's weekend cancelled.Many of us will remember seeing boards with several hand sanitiser dispensers mounted on them.
At the time, I was thinking that if things were bad enough to need them, it should not be allowed to go ahead.
I had already decided to avoid any crowded places. Either they were not really needed - they were just window dressing to make it look as if precautions were being taken - or they were grossly inadequate.
Oyster. There might some variation here. The Head of the Irish National Virological centre , was on TV a few weeks ago, and stated that temperature spikes was not a significant marker. So there might be some genetic factor at play. You will recall that the Public Health in China was measuring forehead temperature before letting people on trains etc.From today's farce. Sorry, briefing.
She adds that temperature checks for Covid-19 isn’t a very valid intervention because of the 14-day incubation period.
Is it a slightly valid intervention? A medium valid intervention? Or a wholly worthless intervention?
I'd argue that if a high temperature is a reasonable marker, then even if you only detect a few cases which happen top present at a critical time, it could be worth doing. (Most especially if high temperature coincides with high infectiousness.)
Q. What does the government intend to do to ease the double pressures on businesses in Northern Ireland impacted by the lockdown and by pending Brexit border checks?
Hancock says the government intends to deliver on the referendum result.
Complete non-answer.
Q. Do you think the prime minister should correct what he said in parliament, given that the only directive on a ban on care home visits came on 2 April, 10 ten days after the national lockdown?
Hancock says that on 13 March, extra guidance was introduced, after which many care home providers stopped visitors.
No comment needed.
Harries adds that R is a very standard way of comparing what’s happening and is an important measure, but the real outcome we need is a reduction in the number of cases.
It’s not just the R value, it’s the triangulation of all the evidence we have, she adds. It’s an important measure but not the only one.
Q. On a day when the R is up, are you absolutely confident that allowing an easing of measures ahead of a sunny, warm weekend is the right decision?
Hancock says R isn’t above 1, so it still meets the test.
It's the triangulation (Harries) but it's still the R number (Hancock).
Add in our self imposed economic sanctions due to Brexit and you start to wonder if he might be lying.In the Telegraph
"
Boris Johnson: No public sector pay freeze and no austerity as UK emerges from coronavirus crisis
Prime Minister tells members of 1922 committee Government is looking at spending heavily on infrastructure as Britain exits lockdown
Is delirium one of the symptoms of Covid 19?
My point about temperature was really the words. I do not know how to interpret "very valid intervention". I am aware of the possibility of infecting before symptoms appear but as you say, its simplicity might just help a little. But if the measurement of temperature, the actual process, is too variable, it could be that temperatures values (as opposed to actual temperatures) are too wayward to be of any value.Oyster. There might some variation here. The Head of the Irish National Virological centre , was on TV a few weeks ago, and stated that temperature spikes was not a significant marker. So there might be some genetic factor at play. You will recall that the Public Health in China was measuring forehead temperature before letting people on trains etc.
In any event the person is transmitting a few days before the onset of any temperature rise. But its such a simple measurement to take, that if it identifies 10% well thats 10% at least of infections twarted.
The R value is NOT a measurement. It is a computed value or quality metric based on measuring and counting cases. Unless one is systematically contact tracing, one does not get the data to compute an R value.
UK government uses R to confuse all of us.The R value is NOT a measurement. It is a computed value or quality metric based on measuring and counting cases. Unless one is systematically contact tracing, one does not get the data to compute an R value.
symptom of Covid19.Is delirium one of the symptoms of Covid 19?
R is not confusing. Think of R as biscuits and your weight as hospital admissions. If you are fat and reduce R (your biscuit intake), after a few weeks your weight (hospital admissions) will reduce. If you then start eating lots of biscuits again (easing lockdown) and so more Rs, after a few weeks your weight ( hospital admissions) will rise.UK government uses R to confuse all of us.
It all too often looks as if they don't know their Rs from their elbows.UK government uses R to confuse all of us.
Coronavirus: Trial begins to see if dogs can 'sniff out' virusOn TV this morning " Training Dogs to sniff out the virus" in the same way dogs can detect cancer and diabetes in people. early stages at the moment.
I don’t know why they aren’t back in the HoC. Is it not safe to return to the workplace or something? If they went back now, they could repay most of the £10000 each that they received to help them work from home.
R is the exponent in the mathematical model. Consequently it is not a measurement, it is a derived value obtained from measurements .. of counting admissions and inference as to the number of contacts.R is not confusing. Think of R as biscuits and your weight as hospital admissions. If you are fat and reduce R (your biscuit intake), after a few weeks your weight (hospital admissions) will reduce. If you then start eating lots of biscuits again (easing lockdown) and so more Rs, after a few weeks your weight ( hospital admissions) will rise.
R is an indicator of what is coming down the tracks in 8 to 10 weeks time. If R is greater than 1, you will first see a rise in the number of positive tests, then hospital admissions will rise, then ICU capacity will start to fill up and finally, the daily death toll will rise.
Everyone is getting a hard on and backslapping due to the falling death rate and hospital admissions, but R is creeping up and if that continues, it will undo the death and hospitalisation rate.
when WHO gave out R=2.2-2.5 in January, the period was 5 days.R is an indicator of what is coming down the tracks in 8 to 10 weeks time.