If it were so easy to do so, isn't it surprising it hasn't yet reached some far greater number by now?But did you?. The guys in the Westminster office claim to have tools to stop it.
A pretty good explanation of Tory policyUnder promise over deliver is my motto.
We don't need to argue anything here. You bring up two unrelated pieces of data - link them with your own theory - and assume there is a case to answer.Are you a Brexit supporter? argue out of this one if you can
Hilarious isn't it?
Is that supposed to be funny. It's not very.A pretty good explanation of Tory policy
They promise Brexit will take 30 years to recover from, then deliver chaos aplenty about how we leave the EU
No, it's simply stating the obviousIs that supposed to be funny. It's not very.
It does indicate the levels of enthusiasm though doesn't it?We don't need to argue anything here. You bring up two unrelated pieces of data - link them with your own theory - and assume there is a case to answer.
In a way it's utterly pointless arguing with OG. His mind can not accept that his side lost. He has to blame something other than the paucity of his own arguments and the failure of the campaign.But you didn't get a result through democratic means it was polluted by illegal means
It's neither 'obvious' nor funny.No, it's simply stating the obvious
Again I am not privy to the tools they use, but basically any package of data sent on the internet can be traced back to the original node... It has to be, provided there is a will. Yes there are spoofing software and so called encryption sites, but their existence can be determined even if the path cannot be back negotiated through them.
However the equivalence of the numbers is unimportant, . The role of the petition was to elicit a response from the HoC, and once it did,there were no more names.
The key one was the vote last week.
Each vote had to be verified by a response to an email sent after voting, before being added to the total.You simply had to have a unique email address. It would be simple for a Russian troll factory or an Indian call centre to do a hundred thousand votes in an hour or two.
The difference is the Russians wouldn’t charge you.
those who did not want May's deal did not want nor need May any longer.
She has done the job they wanted from her: the withdrawal agreement.
Now they know what they need to know, they simply got rid of her to seize power from the tory moderates.
They may as well organise indicative votes in the summer. It's quite likely that they will agree on Canada+, just leave with no deal on October 31, wait until the EU agrees an FTA along the line of Canada+, resurrect the WA but this time with a 'technological solution' to the NI border, ie a fudge, do everything online and ignore a small number of fraudsters.
Each vote had to be verified by a response to an email sent after voting, before being added to the total.
Your call centre would struggle to do that.
.
In a way it's utterly pointless arguing with OG. His mind can not accept that his side lost. He has to blame something other than the paucity of his own arguments and the failure of the campaign.
So what does he blame?
Who knows with him. Its the Russians one week, Facebook and Google the next - the following it will be The John Smith Institute. Anything but look at the simple facts which is in a straight out public argument - the position he now thinks is right - lost the case and the vote.
This is his failure - and he defends against this almost continually.
They say keep your enemies close.Stick the boring old bluffer on ignore. You really won’t regret it.
Can you really be the mug you pretend to be? even when confronted with facts your ignorance is completely unaffected, and here you go again still supporting the result of a Referendum actually proven in court to be obtained by criminal activity.In a way it's utterly pointless arguing with OG. His mind can not accept that his side lost. He has to blame something other than the paucity of his own arguments and the failure of the campaign.
So what does he blame?
Who knows with him. Its the Russians one week, Facebook and Google the next - the following it will be The John Smith Institute. Anything but look at the simple facts which is in a straight out public argument - the position he now thinks is right - lost the case and the vote.
This is his failure - and he defends against this almost continually.
Not much of a reasoned response, but probably the best you can do looking at your previous contributionsStick the boring old bluffer on ignore. You really won’t regret it.
They say keep your enemies close.