KTM
What is unreasonable about that quote?
What evidence is there that the person making it is not a decent person?
What is unreasonable about that quote?
What evidence is there that the person making it is not a decent person?
The first sentence illustrates that they don't understand.The EU parliament/bureaucracy is seen as surplus to requirements.
One of the things the British don't like is to be patted on the head and told: "We know best, you just don't understand."
Since there has never been a"rabid left wing" government in your lifetime, only conservative one's, you are mistaken.OG
I am not spinning anything, merely reporting things that I have seen on other forums.
And, as a conservative, I should object to the ready assumption about 'rabid right wingers'
As far as I can see, the hard left wing 'Spend, spend, spend' nutters are far more of a menace
Indeed, so-called labour governments since have been moderate liberal or pseudo conservative. Recognising this truth, Tony Blair even had the sense to give his brand of conservatism a name, New Labour.Since there has never been a"rabid left wing" government in your lifetime, only conservative one's, you are mistaken.
The last time we had a left wing government was at the end of the second world war, all since have been simply teams playing the same game in different colours.
Well done ! you have insulted the majority of brexit supporters ![emoji1]More patronising from remainers.
Only an idiot would think voting leave would do a lot, or even very much, to reduce immigration.
Easy to say the millions who voted leave are all idiotic racists, but that is not the case.
In a sample that enormous, there's bound to be many ordinary, decent people who formed their view for a wide variety of reasons.
If it was only knuckle-dragging racists who voted leave, remain would have won by a huge margin.
Actually a small majority which by now may not exist.To adequately do that, I would have to undertake the impossible task of interviewing a large sample of leave voters.
For what it's worth, my gut feeling is leave voters in general had had enough of EU meddling - an impression many will have formed over many years.
I believe the British generally favour small government, we already have elected local councils and a national parliament.
We are also not short of various local and national bodies and government departments and agencies to take care of administration and regulation.
The EU parliament/bureaucracy is seen as surplus to requirements.
The patronising tone of the remain campaign cannot have helped.
One of the things the British don't like is to be patted on the head and told: "We know best, you just don't understand."
Add that little lot together and you have what we got - a majority in favour of kicking the EU into the long grass.
It's a shame you cannot post your opinion - second paragraph - without the patronising 'they don't understand' remark.The first sentence illustrates they they don't understand.
It's big boys world now, and we need to be part of one of them. It doesn't have to be the EU though, but that just happens to be a convenient local one and one of the biggest.
.
Fair question.KTM
What is unreasonable about that quote?
What evidence is there that the person making it is not a decent person?
you seem to confirm that brexit leaders were content that the opposition did all the work for them and indeed, most of their supporters don't need to understand the argument.One of the things the British don't like is to be patted on the head and told: "We know best, you just don't understand."
.
factual? that these are the result of the financial crisis, Osborne was using tax money paid by new immigrants to reduce the budget deficit rather than invest into increasing public resources to cope with increasing population.The points about pressure on the NHS and the education system are no more than factual.
.
that sounds a good description and probably true - perhaps with significcant anti establishment feelings following years of austerity, loss of services, disability benefits etc while observing the pay of executives and MP's soar. But - frankly - it's not good enough. most remain voters were also unhappy with the EU. It takes a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the british economy and the world - as well as i'm afraid to say some disturbing knuckle dragging ideas about immigration and human rights - to have voted leave. if one thought it would deliver a happy locally governed flourishing UK one probably deserves whats coming.To adequately do that, I would have to undertake the impossible task of interviewing a large sample of leave voters.
For what it's worth, my gut feeling is leave voters in general had had enough of EU meddling - an impression many will have formed over many years.
I believe the British generally favour small government, we already have elected local councils and a national parliament.
We are also not short of various local and national bodies and government departments and agencies to take care of administration and regulation.
The EU parliament/bureaucracy is seen as surplus to requirements.
The patronising tone of the remain campaign cannot have helped.
One of the things the British don't like is to be patted on the head and told: "We know best, you just don't understand."
Add that little lot together and you have what we got - a majority in favour of kicking the EU into the long grass.
I didn't think I'd need to highlight the issues with the quote but here goes.:KTM
What is unreasonable about that quote?
What evidence is there that the person making it is not a decent person?
The degree of the majority was in now way "well beat at 4%" for such an important step a far more emphatic majority is needed to avoid a permanent split in public opinion on the matter.It's a shame you cannot post your opinion - second paragraph - without the patronising 'they don't understand' remark.
But it does serve to illustrate the general attitude of remainers.
They got well beat, but still cannot grasp that patronising and irritating others will only serve to entrench their opposing view, not alter it.
The reiteration was necessary to making my point.It's a shame you cannot post your opinion - second paragraph - without the patronising 'they don't understand' remark.
No we didn't, the result was marginal, just either side of 50/50, perhaps that's something the Brexiters don't seem able to grasp?But it does serve to illustrate the general attitude of remainers.
They got well beat,
You got beat, it's that simple.The reiteration was necessary to making my point.
No we didn't, the result was marginal, just either side of 50/50, perhaps that's something the Brexiters don't seem able to grasp?
I'm not trying to change any minds, since I'm content that Brexiters embarrassment will inexorably increase as the consequences of exiting grow over time. One day you may not have any straws left to clutch at.
.
Do you honestly think our 'notice to leave' will come as any surprise to the currency speculators?the Pound has another bad day.
Down to $1.28 now.
and that's before we give notice to leave.
It's not a contest. To a point were all in the same boat. There's a brutal reality out there that busy savagely punishing the UK economy for the decision to leave the EU. That isnt going to stop. It's also not only financial: as the UK economy goes into recession, and inflation goes up, and the tax base shrinks, so will public services. The real victims of the decision to leave are not the relatively affluent ebikers on this forum, it's the poor in the UK, who will see more price rises, benefits being withdrawn, public services being cut. They are the ones who will be clutching at straws and those who voted leave should feel ashamed or guilty for causing this.You got beat, it's that simple.
The only straw clutching going on is remainers clinging to their 'marginal' defeat.
I wouldn't mind a penny for every person on that particular margin.