Brexit, for once some facts.

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,387
16,884
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
Also some of this is prohibitively expensive, detection sensors to spot anything at any point on any road when we can't even afford to fill in potholes!
same as the cost of cameras, the cost of sensors will come down rapidly whereas the cost of employing humans (eg to find and fill potholes) tend to go up.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
Removing human drivers will reduce death toll due to traffic accidents.
Having robotic drive on main routes out of town and on in-city arterial routes would eliminate most of the deaths.

For example London has 13.5% of the national population but only 7% of the road deaths. Take out the deaths on the main urban routes that could also be roboticised and urban deaths would greatly reduce with drivers only in charge on very slow portions of journeys.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
same as the cost of cameras, the cost of sensors will come down rapidly whereas the cost of employing humans (eg to find and fill potholes) tend to go up.
As will the cost of the humans fitting those trillions of sensors!
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,387
16,884
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
Having robotic drive on main routes out of town and on in-city arterial routes would eliminate most of the deaths.

For example London has 13.5% of the national population but only 7% of the road deaths. Take out the deaths on the main urban routes that could also be roboticised and urban deaths would greatly reduce with drivers only in charge on very slow portions of journeys.
.
I am most interested in the potential of driverless cars to reduce the number of cars on our roads. Why would you want to own a car if you can just call it up like a taxi?
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
I am most interested in the potential of driverless cars to reduce the number of cars on our roads. Why would you want to own a car if you can just call it up like a taxi?
Because as I've said, it could never do what car does for me. That is indisputable fact, and I can give examples.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
Well done the EU, keeping the business in house, unlike the UK who have opted to lose almost everything to imports.

And that is inaccurate anyway, UK customers don't pay more after the tariffs, we pay the same, just denied the cheap imports that will weaken us all ultimately if we always go for cheap.
.
What? Have you tatsed S. Africa oranges? I have. They seem perfectly good to me. We are paying extra for Spanish oranges whereas once we leave the EU we will get the same but cheaper from S. Africa. How on earth do you manage to twist the logic around any other way than that? Amazing.

No - its not just about price. But you're missing the point - right now we have no choice - we HAVE to pay extra because of the EU.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
Would that not give you reason to pause and think, whether one would wish to be inside the strong organisation which can do that in order to protect their own or be on the outside hoping to get favourable treatment for Scottish whisky?. If Spanish farmers are unemployed, then total revenue within the EU is lessened.
And f**k the farmers in Africa huh? Who can get us as good product for less?
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
I see, you prefer to undermine the Spanish producers for cheap fruit, and to hell with the consequences.
Genuine Tory logic.
ie none at all.
You too huh? F**k the African farmers who can supply the same product for less. And you call yourself a socialist. Shame on you.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
Think about it for second...

1) so do you really think the UK in a post Brexit world is suddenly going to have free trade, no tariff deals with everyone?

In which case it'll still be cheaper for us to get oranges from Spain, because if we've got free trade with Spain and South Africa, it'll still be cheaper from Spain.

So the change will be ZERO.

Or are you going to put a tariff on oranges from Spain, and not from South Africa, in which case the cost to UK consumer will actually be higher than now.

So the only two possible out comes are either, no change, or it'll take longer and cost more.

HOW IS THAT A BENEFIT???

2) The EU does give free trade to the 49 poorest countries in the world to help them compete with the richer ones. Look up the "everything but arms agreement for the details"
What are you talking about? We are not planning to put tariffs on anybody. Especially not S. Africa who say they want a free trade agreement with us. Right now they can produce - AND DELIVER - perfectly good oranges (some might even say better) - FOR LESS MONEY.

Why is this so f***ing hard? 2+2=4. Look it up.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
No - its not just about price. But you're missing the point - right now we have no choice - we HAVE to pay extra because of the EU.
I'm not missing any point, I like the EU and am happy to pay EU prices for the greater good. I'm very sorry that we are leaving the EU, but at least we will be rejoining it when sanity returns.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
Because as I've said, it could never do what car does for me. That is indisputable fact, and I can give examples.
.
As a newly old age pensioner and therefore entitled to a free travel card , I am revelling in the freedom it can afford me if I choose to go into the city. There are functions that at present there a personal car delivers better than alternatives, shopping , urgent journeys, going to the dump . But likewise there are and were alternatives and if social conditions change, these alternatives will reserve. If for example one was in Manhattan, driving or having a car, even for the disabled is bonkers. I am also noticing that many urban dwellers are giving up on cars and getting home delivery services.
A work colleague of mine,at least 15 years younger, had taken early retirement, and spent some two years in France. On his return he had found that all his no claims car insurance benefits had lapsed, and he would have a huge car insurance bill. Car insurance and car prices are much higher in Ireland than in the UK, as we have no automobile industry to protect. His pragmatic solution is to use his ebike around town and hire cars at weekends as required. Much less expensive, no maintenance, no depreciation.
So I appreciate that within the current structures, you believe the private car is indespensible for you, but structures can change.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,387
16,884
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
No - its not just about price. But you're missing the point - right now we have no choice - we HAVE to pay extra because of the EU.
I am for lowering tariff for imports from African countries (I posted about coffee and coffee derivatives) but don't think we pay extra because our supermarkets sell oranges from Spain, Portugal and Morocco, there is no import duty on Morocco fresh oranges (HS code 0805102210).
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
I'm not missing any point, I like the EU and am happy to pay EU prices for the greater good. I'm very sorry that we are leaving the EU, but at least we will be rejoining it when sanity returns.
.
'Greater good'? Well. In my humble (not) opinion that is just total *******. So the Africa farmers are not part of your 'greater good'. Shame on you. Free trade is what has lifted millions of people out of poverty. And will continue to do so. Your attitude sucks.
 
Last edited:

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
So I appreciate that within the current structures, you believe the private car is indespensible for you, but structures can change.
As it happens they can't change, when I said indisputable it was a fact, a driverless taxi could not do for me what a car does, ever.

Sunday 8th October, conducting fungi walk in our nature reserve. Elderly man taken ill and collapsed, concious but as weak as a kitten. Impossible place for a road ambulance and nowhere near for the air ambulance, even if available. I raced down to the car park, unlocked the barrier and drove cross country and through the woods in my 4 x 4 car, picked him up and quickly got him to help. A robotic taxi could never do that, it couldn't unlock the barrier and couldn't handle the surface conditions.

At one time I had a boat which I used to tow down to the coast. A taxi could do that, couldn't handle the area at my end and couldn't launch the boat.

In 2016 I used my car to carry a third of a tonne of gravel at a time doing path repairs in the reserve. A robotic taxi couldn't do that, and couldn't drive in the reserve anyway.

This year I've used a pickup to do that work, same applies, not a chance of a robotic taxi doing it.

These are just a few of the weird and wonderful ways that ordinary people like me use their cars. There are many others, like towing caravans onto open sites, even towing gliders into the air. I'd like to see a robotic taxi do that.
.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,216
30,617
'Greater good' Well. In my humble (not) opinion that is just total *******. So the Africa farmers are not part of your 'greater good'. Shame on you. Free trade is what has lifted millions of people out of poverty. And will continue to do so. Your attitude sucks.
The greater good of the EU by keeping the money inside rather than exporting it. Like others we have aid programs to look after areas of need.

You are the one ************, all you were on about was price, but now you pretend to be concerned about the African farmers to suit your argument.

At least my attitude isn't dishonest.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
The greater good of the EU by keeping the money inside rather than exporting it. Like others we have aid programs to look after areas of need.

You are the one ************, all you were on about was price, but now you pretend to be concerned about the African farmers to suit your argument.

At least my attitude isn't dishonest.
.
Oh - 'Aid' programmes. Where we give money directly to the corrupt leaders of that country. Nice going Flecc, nice going. F**k the poor again huh?
 
  • :D
Reactions: flecc

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
What are you talking about? We are not planning to put tariffs on anybody. Especially not S. Africa who say they want a free trade agreement with us. Right now they can produce - AND DELIVER - perfectly good oranges (some might even say better) - FOR LESS MONEY.

Why is this so f***ing hard? 2+2=4. Look it up.
Oxygen, we do get your point, it is possible to get everything cheaper somewhere, particularly if you reduce the wages of those producing it. The EU is both a trading block, the largest in the world, and a social entity with what many, myself included, believe to be laudible principles. It is not quite as doctrinaire as either the USA or China or the Russian federation. Many of us like that about it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon and flecc

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
The greater good of the EU by keeping the money inside rather than exporting it. Like others we have aid programs to look after areas of need.

You are the one ************, all you were on about was price, but now you pretend to be concerned about the African farmers to suit your argument.

At least my attitude isn't dishonest.
.
Your argument is so totally bankrupt. Yes I gain from this - BUT SO DO THE POOR. You on the other hand want to hand money to the monopoly and the corrupt leaders. And you don't see it. You think I am the one being selfish. You have no idea.
 

Zlatan

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 26, 2016
8,086
4,290
then we change the infrastructure. Motorways weren't built 100 years ago.
Motorways will be first to allow driverless vehicles, then dual carriage ways and so on. We'll fit sensors to the roads to warn driverless vehicles of humans or cows wandering onto the roads (or driving a vehicle)..
Why ?

We are solving a,problem here that does not exist .
 
  • Agree
Reactions: flecc

Advertisers