we have been here before...I thought the energy losses between the generator and hub motor were awful....we decided the good old chain is a very efficient transfer of power.
KudosDave
As far as I can see, this doesn't feature any DC-DC conversion or secondary energy storage as part of the generation, which tends to be the most inefficient parts of the traditional generator model.we have been here before...I thought the energy losses between the generator and hub motor were awful....we decided the good old chain is a very efficient transfer of power.
KudosDave
Indeed, and the provision of selectable generation rates from pedal effort is much better than in the Mando implementation.As far as I can see, this doesn't feature any DC-DC conversion or secondary energy storage as part of the generation, which tends to be the most inefficient parts of the traditional generator model.
If you're just talking about a simple transmission system that's true, but when you look at a complete system with CVT, the system is viable.we have been here before...I thought the energy losses between the generator and hub motor were awful....we decided the good old chain is a very efficient transfer of power.
KudosDave
to be an EAPC, it has to cut assistance at 25kph. So it can't go over 25kph on flat roads however fit the cyclist is.I'm not so sure. It has a programmable assist speed limit, the highest setting being 25 kph, so within pedelec law. If the software ensures that current from battery to motor can only pass when the pedals are turning, it's pedelec compliant.
Danish, where the EU law applies, so I'd think they'd have ensured compliance.
.
It certainly looks that way, but there may be a legal argument to dispute that.to be an EAPC, it has to cut assistance at 25kph. So it can't go over 25kph on flat roads however fit the cyclist is.