Hi all,
I have just clocked up 1000miles on my converted hardtail MTB and have noticed some changes with the battery and charger behaviour.
Now, here's the tricky bit. I don't know what the battery chemistry or cell count is. I know the first piece of advice to be offered will be to tear the battery down and find out but that's going to be a mammoth task given the installation and I'm not sure I want to go down that route. I wonder if anyone can make any deductions based on the following information?
1. The kit was sold a "1500W Electric Bike Kit including 60V 18ah Battery".
2. When the kit was new, I recall the battery charging to about 71.4V, however, now it only holds 69.2V.
When the charger has finished bulk charging and the BMS is balancing, the voltage does briefly pulse up to 71-72V, but it would appear the cells cant quite hold it there, like when new. Not a major change but in my previous experience with RC LiPo batteries, a cell not holding full charge was not a good sign. This may be perfectly normal with Li-ion though, I don't know so require educating
I have also read that it could be the charger drifting away from nominal and adjusting one of the internal poti's to a higher cut off voltage may help, but not sure if this is a good idea? There are 3 poti's inside that aren't labelled.
Is it possible to comment on this information as to what chemistry the battery is "likely" to be? At 71.4V fully charged (new), my guess would be 17S Li-ion.
The reason I'm trying to work this out is that I need another charger. I'm commuting on the bike and not doing much pedalling to be honest, so a top up in work would be handy. I'm thinking of keeping the supplied 5A charger in work and buying maybe a 2A charger for overnight at home.
I see lots of chargers for sale and 60V seems to be commonly quoted, would this be the right spec? What I mean is do the chargers quote nominal battery voltage in their specs, as opposed to fully charged voltage, for example? What's confusing is that I also see 71.4V 17S chargers listed, so there seems not to be a norm for the labelling.
Thanks all,
Jon
I have just clocked up 1000miles on my converted hardtail MTB and have noticed some changes with the battery and charger behaviour.
Now, here's the tricky bit. I don't know what the battery chemistry or cell count is. I know the first piece of advice to be offered will be to tear the battery down and find out but that's going to be a mammoth task given the installation and I'm not sure I want to go down that route. I wonder if anyone can make any deductions based on the following information?
1. The kit was sold a "1500W Electric Bike Kit including 60V 18ah Battery".
2. When the kit was new, I recall the battery charging to about 71.4V, however, now it only holds 69.2V.
When the charger has finished bulk charging and the BMS is balancing, the voltage does briefly pulse up to 71-72V, but it would appear the cells cant quite hold it there, like when new. Not a major change but in my previous experience with RC LiPo batteries, a cell not holding full charge was not a good sign. This may be perfectly normal with Li-ion though, I don't know so require educating
I have also read that it could be the charger drifting away from nominal and adjusting one of the internal poti's to a higher cut off voltage may help, but not sure if this is a good idea? There are 3 poti's inside that aren't labelled.
Is it possible to comment on this information as to what chemistry the battery is "likely" to be? At 71.4V fully charged (new), my guess would be 17S Li-ion.
The reason I'm trying to work this out is that I need another charger. I'm commuting on the bike and not doing much pedalling to be honest, so a top up in work would be handy. I'm thinking of keeping the supplied 5A charger in work and buying maybe a 2A charger for overnight at home.
I see lots of chargers for sale and 60V seems to be commonly quoted, would this be the right spec? What I mean is do the chargers quote nominal battery voltage in their specs, as opposed to fully charged voltage, for example? What's confusing is that I also see 71.4V 17S chargers listed, so there seems not to be a norm for the labelling.
Thanks all,
Jon
Last edited: