Deus, thanks for posting a very interesting test, but the tester is a complete numbskull, no eye or face protection.......so one cannot be 100% sure that he even picked the correct "weak point" on the device.....
He definitely had safety glasses on.Deus, thanks for posting a very interesting test, but the tester is a complete numbskull, no eye or face protection.......so one cannot be 100% sure that he even picked the correct "weak point" on the device.....
Thanks again
Andy
Didnt you watch the actual vid, or just for a few seconds before posting. You can clearly see he's wearing eye protection from 2:43 on where the camera has panned out.but the tester is a complete numbskull, no eye or face protection
I just looked, you are right. Many thanks for correcting my incorrect "thoughts".He definitely had safety glasses on.
But would your average scrote know to examine it that closely, or just think it a standard bar and try to cut through the loop section. By the nature of their 'profession' they aren't the shiniest buttons in the box.I just looked, you are right. Many thanks for correcting my incorrect "thoughts".
It still leaves the question of possible real weak points that he did not appear to try and break though.....he just cut in one place..........or did I miss something else?
regards
Andy