Sorry BAH48, but I disagree fundamentally. WD40 is not a lubricant! As avid completist readers of this forum may know, I acquired a Kalkhoff Pro-Connect S from another member in December 2012. On the 9th of April the chain parted going up a slight incline. After the chain was replaced, the transmission started slipping under load regularly. At the Edinburgh Cycle Company this was instantly diagnosed as significant wear in the rear cassette.
On back-tracking through this forum, I learned that the previous owner's 'lubricant' of choice was WD40. I find that describing WD40 as a 'lubricant' to professional cycle mechanics generally prompts slapping of the forehead, fierce oaths, hilarity or any combination of the three.
This is not a complaint about the bike I bought. (Caveat emptor). I reckon that replacing the chain and the rear cassette has improved the mechanical efficiency of the transmission by about 10 to 15%. I can tell that from both a higher top speed, and an increase in cruising speed of 1 to 2 mph without putting more effort in. My PC-S has gone from being a very good bike to being a great bike in my view.
If you go to the WD40 website, you'll read that "WD-40 literally stands for Water Displacement, 40th formula". Under FAQs about bikes the makers claim that "you can use it on frames to prevent them from rusting, to lubricate pivot points, to prevent mud from sticking and to displace moisture from bike components". Nothing about chains, though, and here's a quote from a website called Gizmodo: "while WD-40 is useful for everything from unsticking gum to cleaning tile, you shouldn't spray it anywhere near your bike. It causes dirt and dust to stick to your chain, turning it into a grody mess". That's my philosophy.
Incidentally the replacement chain on my PC-S is an especially long version for electric bikes made by KMC.
Electric Bike Chains
It works fine, and there's no need to buy 2 shorter chains and join them.