Flecc thanks for those tips. I think they will help (as in I didnt do those things you mentioned, Im used to deraillers and so....). I will try them at my earliest convenience (its xmas and my wife is very persistant).
50 cycles - to be honest, it was all about hill climbing. I would LOVE a Torq, but it cannot match the twist (according to everyone that owns both) for hill climbing, and where I live, thats a major factor.
Personally, I think/have always percieved (before I knew of elec-bikes that is) that mtbs and/or racers were the only real bikes worth any consideration at all. Ive grown up in the uk and know nothing of the dutch or american bikes and their style-isms.
To me the twist (which Ive bought), on paper, looks like I should consider delivering mail on my way to work - and in fact, when my work colleagues saw the pictue of the bike I have bought, they asked if I wouldnt mind posting a few parcels on the way home at night (cheeky b's)
We really are conditioned well arent we, "If it doesnt look like an mtb or a racer, and your not wearing lycra, then it isnt a bike." ......and how long have there actually been mtbs??? I remember the Raleigh Boxer, was that the first mass produced mtb??
The Sprint was a real contender. The only concerns I had on the Sprint (apart from the fact it was out of stock, and for the fact that everyone that owned a twist said the Sprint was, 'nearly as good') was mainly the looks. Dont get me wrong, the Sprint is a good looking bike. But if I was to get overtaken on a hill by a Twist (which I think looks better) when I could have bought one.....well, kicking myself wouldnt come into it.
Having said all this, I am still really interested in 3 of the 50 cycles bikes, the Sprint, Torq, and Quando (I REALLY like the Quando, esp if it could fold smaller). I think they are really really good bikes, and have fantastic 'potential'. If they had better hill climbing, then they would earn a reputation that matches or even surpasses the Twists', and to be emulated.
Does that help answer your question?
John
50 cycles - to be honest, it was all about hill climbing. I would LOVE a Torq, but it cannot match the twist (according to everyone that owns both) for hill climbing, and where I live, thats a major factor.
Personally, I think/have always percieved (before I knew of elec-bikes that is) that mtbs and/or racers were the only real bikes worth any consideration at all. Ive grown up in the uk and know nothing of the dutch or american bikes and their style-isms.
To me the twist (which Ive bought), on paper, looks like I should consider delivering mail on my way to work - and in fact, when my work colleagues saw the pictue of the bike I have bought, they asked if I wouldnt mind posting a few parcels on the way home at night (cheeky b's)
We really are conditioned well arent we, "If it doesnt look like an mtb or a racer, and your not wearing lycra, then it isnt a bike." ......and how long have there actually been mtbs??? I remember the Raleigh Boxer, was that the first mass produced mtb??
The Sprint was a real contender. The only concerns I had on the Sprint (apart from the fact it was out of stock, and for the fact that everyone that owned a twist said the Sprint was, 'nearly as good') was mainly the looks. Dont get me wrong, the Sprint is a good looking bike. But if I was to get overtaken on a hill by a Twist (which I think looks better) when I could have bought one.....well, kicking myself wouldnt come into it.
Having said all this, I am still really interested in 3 of the 50 cycles bikes, the Sprint, Torq, and Quando (I REALLY like the Quando, esp if it could fold smaller). I think they are really really good bikes, and have fantastic 'potential'. If they had better hill climbing, then they would earn a reputation that matches or even surpasses the Twists', and to be emulated.
Does that help answer your question?
John
Last edited: