Recent content by Blacklite

Calling someone "son" like you just did isn't civil. Asking "Do you polish your husband's big swinging balls shiny" is also not civil. Pointing out your hypocrisy isn't an "endless, baseless attack". It's calling out a hypocrite. Can you please post where I have endlessly and baselessly...

If it was a woman would that make that comment fine? Even though we all know that you meant it as a gay slur, it would still be unbelievably inappropriate no matter what gender it referred to. You can't claim that you want civility and then be shown to have posted things like that. It's not...

Civility noun formal politeness and courtesy in behaviour or speech. The tone in your earlier post is anything but civil. And the homophobic slur is disgusting.

Not complaining and I have been engaging in conversation. I will post a review of the motor when I receive it and have had time to use it. I’m sure you don’t want me to review it before I have it - though that would seem to fit much more into the dialogue in this thread.

Yes. I was talking about the behaviour of actually monitoring who was looking at a post. Because you can doesn’t mean it’s not weird to do so.

Anyone else find this behaviour stalkerish?

The toll gate is not a good example. I stand corrected though, the part you posted potentially might work. The RFID chip then though would not be functioning as an amplifier. It would be functioning as the analog to digital converter for the analog sensor.

Radio-frequency identification (RFID) uses electromagnetic fields to automatically identify and track tags attached to objects. An RFID system consists of a tiny radio transponder, a radio receiver and transmitter. When triggered by an electromagnetic interrogation pulse from a nearby RFID...

It “looks like to me like” is very different to “clearly marked”. Do you think the earth is flat because it looks like it? Also when you spew out labels like NFC or RFID do you even know what they mean? Neither of those things is an amplifier. Both refer to short range wireless communications...

Can you please show me where the “the two coils are clearly marked”? It may be inductively transferred. It may not be. Your approach though of assuming something, saying there is proof, and then revealing your proof is just because you have made the assumption is one of the more interesting...

I guess it's interesting that you assume it's inductive transfer. Are you looking at it beyond your current perceptions?

It's not if it is a strain gauge that interests me... it's the mechanism of transmission of that information. An inductance transmission that rotates is always going to be subject to movement. And forgive me for not remembering all my physics and engineering classes, but from memory inductive...

I don't particularly want to argue, but I don't think the diagram gives enough information to show that. Maybe it is, maybe it is not.

The extra bearings are an excellent addition. For the torque sensor the diagram doesn’t really show if the sensor is inductively coupled or if part 16 is actually just electrical contacts for connection.

So you have a torque sensor Bafang BBS series? Or just making stuff up?