Hi everyone. Newby - please be kind. Thank you
I've been looking at buying an electric bike to replace my much loved 1997 Specialized Rockhopper. I bought it new, and I haven't had anything else since, so I've no clue whatsoever about current bikes. I commute into work on it and it's about 19 miles - which takes me about an hour and 10 mins - so I average about 17ish mph and it's mostly flat as I follow the coastline.
The bike which takes my fancy is the Haibike sduro Cross but, as you know, they all stop doing their thing at 15mph so if I wanted to maintain my 'normal' speed I'd have to put in a lot more effort than I currently do due to the extra weight.
The reason for purchase is 95% to make my commute easier and 5% to play a bit on the trails at the weekend but I'm concerned I might be wasting my money as I'd have to ride it slower to gain the benefit of the motor when I could just ride my normal bike slower to gain a similar benefit. Would I be better spending the £2k on a normal bike or am I missing something?
Or.......dare I say it....should I get it derestricted? I'm not interested in going any faster than I currently do, but I would like it to be easier on my aging body, especially when it gets a bit breezy - which it does quite a lot along the east coast.
Thanks for reading
Steven
I've been looking at buying an electric bike to replace my much loved 1997 Specialized Rockhopper. I bought it new, and I haven't had anything else since, so I've no clue whatsoever about current bikes. I commute into work on it and it's about 19 miles - which takes me about an hour and 10 mins - so I average about 17ish mph and it's mostly flat as I follow the coastline.
The bike which takes my fancy is the Haibike sduro Cross but, as you know, they all stop doing their thing at 15mph so if I wanted to maintain my 'normal' speed I'd have to put in a lot more effort than I currently do due to the extra weight.
The reason for purchase is 95% to make my commute easier and 5% to play a bit on the trails at the weekend but I'm concerned I might be wasting my money as I'd have to ride it slower to gain the benefit of the motor when I could just ride my normal bike slower to gain a similar benefit. Would I be better spending the £2k on a normal bike or am I missing something?
Or.......dare I say it....should I get it derestricted? I'm not interested in going any faster than I currently do, but I would like it to be easier on my aging body, especially when it gets a bit breezy - which it does quite a lot along the east coast.
Thanks for reading
Steven