That's the best place for it.that has the gears inside the motor
That's the best place for it.that has the gears inside the motor
Just a pity it's the inefficient NuVinci system.That's the best place for it.
I can ! I just press a little harder on the pedals for one stroke before easing off and changing gear and that not a theory, it’s a fact.You can't pause pedalling when you're going up a steep hill, which is when the load is highest
I am older than I care to admit. I recall my father extolling the virtues of 3 Speed Sturmey Archer when I built a bike with 10 derailleur gears (2x 5) when I was perhaps 15 in the late 60's. When I went to 20 in early naughties (2 x10) he nearly fell off his chair. I'm still on 2x10 btw, I've not worn them out yet (on three bikes) Another sign of age. Do I need 2x12? It might just fill that gap now I need wider gears, but I cant justify the cost.True enough and I was already well aware. But in practice utility riders don't worry about such minutiae, they usually just ride at the speed and effort levels they are comfortable with. They don't care if it's a mile or two per hour slower and cycling in The Netherlands where hub gears are very popular illustrates this very well.
I'm old enough to remember when it was the same in Britain and when my boss in the trade snorted in derision at the first deralleur we saw in the shop, saying, "Ridiculous, who would ever need more than three gears".
.
And lots of duplicated ratios!i got 10-50t and 2 front sprockets
That's correct. Although that four gear hub was their most efficient, it was their most unreliable. A string of its failures on the low powered Giant Lafree Comfort model caused Shimano to discontinue it.From memory, I think my particular model was known to have issues and was discontinued after a short while. Lost my faith in Shimano after that.
Yes and yes. But I like our Nexus 8, used together with its Gates belt a lot more.What about the old Sturmey Archer then. Do they still exist? Didn't they last for ever?!
Yes, but the company name and assets were bought by the Sunrace company in Taiwan where they are now made.What about the old Sturmey Archer then. Do they still exist? Didn't they last for ever?!
I'm struggling a bit with the above paragraph as I would have thought that anything putting back tension on the chain will be a force working against the gear trying to drive it forwards.Genuine research here says that the biggest factors affecting the drive train efficiency are sprocket size and the amount of tension in the chain. Higher tension gives greater efficiency, so that implies that a derailleur would be more efficient due to the higher chain tension provided by the spring in the derailleur unless you have a sprung tensioner on your hub gears. The video is interesting. It shows virtually no energy being wasted on the derailleur compared with the drive sprocket.
Hmmmm! IMHO, you're missing a couple of things and what you're saying isn't quite right. If your type of gears were so X-fantastic, they'd be using them in the Tour de France, but they don't. I'm going to say that they're too clumsy, too heavy, too unreliable and make wheel removal more complicated.My X-rd3 and X-rd5(w) both change gear on the steepest Snowdonia , has to offer . I change up hill I take weight off chain indeed the X-rd3 has a gear change sensor that stops the motor while the shift takes place. I change stationary and down hill too easy easy peasey what ever. If you find any other scenario there’s something wrong either with technique or mal-adjusted somethings . It couldn’t be more simple. Unlike derailleur systems where it takes meters and meters of road to complete a change. Especially when it comes to a monster hill climbing granny. It’s the opposite of what’s easy and requires forward thinking that in return requires experience.5
Hmmmm! IMHO, you're missing a couple of things and what you're saying isn't quite right. If your type of gears were so X-fantastic, they'd be using them in the Tour de France, but they don't. I'm going to say that they're too clumsy, too heavy, too unreliable and make wheel removal more complicated.
I don't know where you get the idea that derailleur gears "takes meters and meters to complete a change" from. You need to compare like for like regarding cost, not compare a rather expensive hub with cheap stamped gears on a £100 catalogue bike that never got set up between leaving the factory and its regular journeys to the station, whose gears probably cost less than a fiver. Properly adjusted decent derailleur gears will not only shift quicker than hub gears, but even during mid shift, they're still allowing transmission of power. In other words, whether shifting up or down, drive is continuous because the chain is always engaged with enough teeth to provide drive. This gives a massive advantage in any sort of racing, and leisure riders get that advantage when hill-climbing. On really steep hills, like 25% plus,, you can't afford to pause between shifting because the bike will stop, then you're stuck - horses for courses.
In summary, hub-gears are great for the girls that want to have a liesurly ride down to the supermarket without getting their dresses caught in the gears or chain.
To change one sprocket on my Shimano XT takes between 1and 2 seconds. Almost too quick to time.My X-rd3 and X-rd5(w) both change gear on the steepest Snowdonia , has to offer . I change up hill I take weight off chain indeed the X-rd3 has a gear change sensor that stops the motor while the shift takes place. I change stationary and down hill too easy easy peasey what ever. If you find any other scenario there’s something wrong either with technique or mal-adjusted somethings . It couldn’t be more simple. Unlike derailleur systems where it takes meters and meters of road to complete a change. Especially when it comes to a monster hill climbing granny. It’s the opposite of what’s easy and requires forward thinking that in return requires experience.5