I have a theory what could have happened to this lost Malaysian plane. Recently there was a hi-jacking when the pilot on a Somalian airline decided to seek political asylum. He waited until the captain went to the toilet,then locked the door from the cabin to the flight deck,stopping the captain returning to the cockpit. He safely landed the plane in Switzerland and sought asylum-the point is that there was no way that the captain could get back into the cockpit.
Imagine if either pilot left the cockpit and the remaining pilot locked the door. If that pilot had a sudden heart attack,then there is no way the second pilot could return to the cockpit, the door between cabin and cockpit is now armoured so difficult to break through,to prevent terrorists gaining access to the cockpit.
I am aware that some airlines have a procedure that if a pilot has to go to the toilet,then the seat belt signs are switched on,a cabin crew has to go into the cockpit and another stands facing the cabin-this I believe is to ensure that 2 persons are in the cockpit at all times.
Coming back to the lost Malaysian plane,if the cockpit was only manned by a stricken pilot then the plane would fly on auto until it run out of fuel. Imagine the frustration of the second pilot not being able to gain access back into the cockpit. The plane had 6 plus hours of fuel,at 500 mph,the plane would fly on auto for 3000 miles,way out over the Andaman sea and into the Indian Ocean.
That would mean the crash would happen in a very lonely spot and way away from the search area,hence not finding any debris.
I am no aviation expert and there may be many reasons why my theory is not correct. I am surprised that they cannot follow the track of this plane on satellite history.
If I am correct then the '2 persons in the cockpit' procedure should be adopted worldwide,otherwise it seems a situation that could easily occur.
Any aviation experts out there to correct or enlarge upon my theory.
KudosDave
Imagine if either pilot left the cockpit and the remaining pilot locked the door. If that pilot had a sudden heart attack,then there is no way the second pilot could return to the cockpit, the door between cabin and cockpit is now armoured so difficult to break through,to prevent terrorists gaining access to the cockpit.
I am aware that some airlines have a procedure that if a pilot has to go to the toilet,then the seat belt signs are switched on,a cabin crew has to go into the cockpit and another stands facing the cabin-this I believe is to ensure that 2 persons are in the cockpit at all times.
Coming back to the lost Malaysian plane,if the cockpit was only manned by a stricken pilot then the plane would fly on auto until it run out of fuel. Imagine the frustration of the second pilot not being able to gain access back into the cockpit. The plane had 6 plus hours of fuel,at 500 mph,the plane would fly on auto for 3000 miles,way out over the Andaman sea and into the Indian Ocean.
That would mean the crash would happen in a very lonely spot and way away from the search area,hence not finding any debris.
I am no aviation expert and there may be many reasons why my theory is not correct. I am surprised that they cannot follow the track of this plane on satellite history.
If I am correct then the '2 persons in the cockpit' procedure should be adopted worldwide,otherwise it seems a situation that could easily occur.
Any aviation experts out there to correct or enlarge upon my theory.
KudosDave
Last edited: