I agree, complete nonsense since it would be impossible to hide the essential components at the wheel interface and the easily checked high weight of the QD wheel would be an instant giveaway.The article was sickening to read, WTF was all that about cheating? It is a light weight e-bike (with another non user changeable battery) with interesting technology on board. Why must it automatically become a tool for cheating in pro racing?
I'd love to see manufacturers quote this magic figure for their bikes, preferably with as little pedaling as possible.It would be interesting to see the numbers for acceleration to 25 kmh..
I agree those benefits and better torque than existing DD motors, but still think the power consumption could be a big problem.With a promised power of 500W, therefore on the smaller side compared to the usual DD motors, this motor gives enormous benefits: can have hub gears, lighter, the wheel diameter gives it a better torque (depending on the number of poles) than other DD motors of similar power, it can easily be made EN15194 compliant, very low maintenance compared to existing motors of all types (especially crank drives) and excellent weight distribution.
Not really possible though. Only throttle controlled bikes could give comparable figures and torque sensored bikes would depend too heavily on the rider input to make any sense.I'd love to see manufacturers quote this magic figure for their bikes, preferably with as little pedaling as possible.
(this is where you can sort the men from the boys).
I very much doubt under 20 kilos, theres a lot of iron in the poles around the wheel, especially aiming for 1000 watts. I've got reservations on the 500 watts anyway, it's very much a claim at present.I bet we would still be under 20 kg. And it would have some serious range or do smoky burnouts at the trafic lights