Ah, but then you'd have to strip out the loss of the exchequer income (the Norwegians put theirs into a trust whereas we used ours to pay our expenses), which might have led to different outcomes affecting the final figure. Plus no point in saving if it means many will be too dead to enjoy the interest payments! So maybe we've actually had some good things the Norwegians haven't.Had we done that with the North Sea output, each of us would possibly be worth £16,000 and get the interest from that each year. Instead our national debt is £41,400 per taxpayer/wage earner on which we each pay £1400 interest every year.
.
I guess Norway may also have been in a somewhat different position if it chose to invade several countries and develop an economy based mainly on financial services as opposed to producing high tech stuff over the past forty odd yearsNorway gets so many things spectacularly right. Unlike the way we wasted the income from North Sea oil and gas, they decided to invest all the income.
They now sit on 500 billions equivalent, meaning each of the 4 million Norwegian men, women and children is worth 125,000 in invested cash and each benefits annually from the interest that earns.
Had we done that with the North Sea output, each of us would possibly be worth £16,000 and get the interest from that each year. Instead our national debt is £41,400 per taxpayer/wage earner on which we each pay £1400 interest every year.
Which government would you wish we'd had over the last half century?
.
Very much my point, plus the ways we squandered that North Sea income. Such things as three aircraft carriers built for the 1980s, all three now decommissioned and only one ever seeing any genuine but questionable action. We really have almost nothing to show for all that income we spent.I guess Norway may also have been in a somewhat different position if it chose to invade several countries and develop an economy based mainly on financial services as opposed to producing high tech stuff over the past forty odd years