In a previous post, I summarised my measurements of the watts taken from the mains by the charger for my 18Ah Kalkhoff battery. I have now measured the voltage during charging with a newly aquired digital voltmeter but before reporting that I consider the battery connections:
Connections view showing bottom of battery positioned ready to insert into the battery socket on my Agattu.
I have number the pins/sockets starting from pin 1 at the fore end of the bike.
When I took the voltage reading the battery had been discharged to the point when only 1 LED out of 5 was illuminated on the battery.
I confirmed that pins 1 and 4 were supplying the current for the bike's motor by observing that 462 ma flowed when I connected a 54 ohm resistor between pins 1 and 4.
Here is the view of the battery charger pins in the same orientation/numbering system:
The charging power appears between pin 2 and pin 4. Pin 4 is +ve. However the charger is actually marked with the opposite polarity i.e. pin2 has a + and pin 4 has a - embossed on the plastic. I have marked the location of these embossed symbols in the picture above.. I don't know the reason for this marking which is the reverse of what I actually measure with a meter.
Connections view showing bottom of battery positioned ready to insert into the battery socket on my Agattu.
I have number the pins/sockets starting from pin 1 at the fore end of the bike.
When I took the voltage reading the battery had been discharged to the point when only 1 LED out of 5 was illuminated on the battery.
I confirmed that pins 1 and 4 were supplying the current for the bike's motor by observing that 462 ma flowed when I connected a 54 ohm resistor between pins 1 and 4.
Here is the view of the battery charger pins in the same orientation/numbering system:
The charging power appears between pin 2 and pin 4. Pin 4 is +ve. However the charger is actually marked with the opposite polarity i.e. pin2 has a + and pin 4 has a - embossed on the plastic. I have marked the location of these embossed symbols in the picture above.. I don't know the reason for this marking which is the reverse of what I actually measure with a meter.
Attachments
-
45.1 KB Views: 195
-
23.5 KB Views: 42
-
4.3 KB Views: 186
Last edited: