Tell me SIR?MADAM?**** or get off the pot. Or perhaps, just get off the pot.
My head is really beginning to hurt. Just what is the point of these contributions.Tell me SIR?MADAM?
How is you are so prepared to accept one verbal version of me ( The pot one as fact ) but the other one as just a load of nonsense.
What?I really should have been expecting THE 1st Time I sort your welcome .
No, you need not apologise, nor would an apology solve anything.Having to apologies for my eclectic method of doing so... i find strange BUT~ obviously I must, otherwise we would be able , even at this point to restart with.....
hello Flecc,No, you need not apologise, nor would an apology solve anything.
What is needed is for you to make an attempt to express yourself in understandable terms. It needn't be very good English, just sufficiently grammatical for us to understand your meaning.
My opinion is that to date you have been deliberately intending to do anything but that, and your recognition of your eclectic method illustrates by it's awareness that I was correct in my assumption.
YsFly,
Please get to the point and tell everyone about this idea you have, which you have stated you wish to make freely available. The members on this forum can then help you determine whether it has any mileage or not.
If you can't do this, then I'm afraid I will have to put all your future posts into a moderation queue and vet each one.
DEAR RUSS,
With all due respect * IT IS NOT THAT SIMPLE * (sorry) for just as you and others do not want to be thought the FOOL, so too do I.
AND~ that to me equates to a step by step (my way please) approach. I've tried to both tell you and ask for help from those who have the necessary skills, and thought i had found one BUT~
for you that think ideas should be explored, please offer some support here, for if you will not allow me to SHOW you my way....
RUSS IS RIGHT>>>> put this to the Moderation queue.
AND BY...
I have been following your contributions hoping that you would eventually clarify your requirements of this forum. Unless you aid our understanding by clearly stating your requests and requirements then all your communication on here will have failed. It doesn't have to be this way. Please help us to understand otherwise I, for one, will switch off and ignore your posts. Having said that i don't agree with any attempt to stop your posts or delay them. I'm hoping to learn from you however please help us.hello Flecc,
I think i take your point, but just to be sure, are you suggesting that I did in fact know what i was doing the 1st time i posted
*and your recognition of your eclectic method illustrates by it's awareness that I was correct in my assumption*
AND if so... given that... why would you think i don't now, and/or that i've changed my then intentions in anyway.
I ask because MY EXPERIENCE of that experience found 1,2 and a few more being supportive BUT~ in the main everyone else trying to second guess both my eclectic method and the veracity with which i approached this forum in the 1st place. AND ~at that not withouta great deal of ridicule too..... rather than.... going with the flow.
FOR~ none but me... i think, could know what i had in mind then, and now.
Imagining will give the wrong answer. You have to apply science and calculations. When you turn on the first tap, the fountain will flow. Turn on the second and third tap and there will be no change because the pressure in the fountain will be the sameFOR EXAMPLE:
Please imagine ~ a hose pipe (conductive wire) with 3 taps connected + a lawn fountain. WHAT now would happen if : The 1st pipe is running and then another the 2nd is opened and then the 3rd after that.
In addition If the 2 other taps had the crank part able to spin whist only the first tap was on ... what would happen then under the same circumstance.
FURTHER MORE~ WOULD THAT NOT BE more visual... if animated, and that therefore needing a E-biker with animation skills... at fingertip ?
Oh right; it's a TRANDEM!dear vectra,
You've no idea how much I'd like to do just that< BUT~ do you think it's possible to do so without any one second guessing or assuming from the question you want me to be explicit about that that is the main idea, rather than a question that I need answered in order for the IDEA~ to be considered as viable... to me .. in the 1st place.
FOR EXAMPLE:
Please imagine ~ a hose pipe (conductive wire) with 3 taps connected + a lawn fountain. WHAT now would happen if : The 1st pipe is running and then another the 2nd is opened and then the 3rd after that.
In addition If the 2 other taps had the crank part able to spin whist only the first tap was on ... what would happen then under the same circumstance.
FURTHER MORE~ WOULD THAT NOT BE more visual... if animated, and that therefore needing a E-biker with animation skills... at fingertip ?
Thanks for the come back 1st,Imagining will give the wrong answer. You have to apply science and calculations. When you turn on the first tap, the fountain will flow. Turn on the second and third tap and there will be no change because the pressure in the fountain will be the same
The equivalent for a motor would be having one battery joined to a motor with three sets of wires. Assuming that the wires are designed to carry sufficient current, the motor won't change speed or power by joining additional wires because the voltage will be the same and so will be the impedence of the motor windings.
I hope I haven't spoilt your dream!