I was reading the viewers letters on Teletext this evening and yet again I saw more letters spitting venom at cyclists riding on pavements. It really does seem to be a very serious issue for some folk.
I'm not keen on cycling on pavements myself (except to avoid some nasty junctions) because I prefer the road, they're faster and smoother. However as someone who's done more than his fair share of walking on pavements I must say I can't see it's really much of an issue . The only near miss I've ever had, as a pedestrian, was with some elderly gentleman on a mobility scooter who must have pressed the wrong button and rocketed to 8 miles per hour and a mum mounting the pavement to park closer to the school gates .
Anyway I was interested in the real statistics rather than what appears to be hatefull prejudice and found a CTC link which only covers London. I guess London is the very worst case.
The figures show that, in London during the period 2001-05:
"There were 101 times as many reported pedestrian injuries due to collisions with motor vehicles than with pedal cycles (there were 34,791 pedestrian injuries involving motor vehicles, compared with 331 involving cycles).
Motor vehicles were involved in 126 times as many fatal and serious pedestrian injuries as cycles (there were 7,447 fatal and serious injuries involving motor vehicles compared with 59 involving cycles).
534 pedestrians were killed in collisions with motor vehicles, compared with just one killed in collision with a cycle. That one fatal collision with a cycle occurred neither on a pavement nor a pedestrian crossing point.
Even on the pavement, there were 2,197 reported pedestrian injuries arising from collisions with motor vehicles, including 17 fatalities. These injuries outnumbered those involving cycles by a factor of 42 to 1.
The total number of reported pedestrian injuries in London due to collisions with cyclists on pavements was just 65 in the year 2001, and 69 in 2005. In the meantime, the figure went down, up and back down again, showing no clear overall trend. This was despite a 72% increase in cycle use over the period.
On average just under 18% of cyclists ran red lights, whereas over a third of motorists encroached into cyclists’ “Advance Stop Lines” (cycle boxes at traffic lights). "
http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/Press_Archive/Share_the_Road1.doc
I'm not keen on cycling on pavements myself (except to avoid some nasty junctions) because I prefer the road, they're faster and smoother. However as someone who's done more than his fair share of walking on pavements I must say I can't see it's really much of an issue . The only near miss I've ever had, as a pedestrian, was with some elderly gentleman on a mobility scooter who must have pressed the wrong button and rocketed to 8 miles per hour and a mum mounting the pavement to park closer to the school gates .
Anyway I was interested in the real statistics rather than what appears to be hatefull prejudice and found a CTC link which only covers London. I guess London is the very worst case.
The figures show that, in London during the period 2001-05:
"There were 101 times as many reported pedestrian injuries due to collisions with motor vehicles than with pedal cycles (there were 34,791 pedestrian injuries involving motor vehicles, compared with 331 involving cycles).
Motor vehicles were involved in 126 times as many fatal and serious pedestrian injuries as cycles (there were 7,447 fatal and serious injuries involving motor vehicles compared with 59 involving cycles).
534 pedestrians were killed in collisions with motor vehicles, compared with just one killed in collision with a cycle. That one fatal collision with a cycle occurred neither on a pavement nor a pedestrian crossing point.
Even on the pavement, there were 2,197 reported pedestrian injuries arising from collisions with motor vehicles, including 17 fatalities. These injuries outnumbered those involving cycles by a factor of 42 to 1.
The total number of reported pedestrian injuries in London due to collisions with cyclists on pavements was just 65 in the year 2001, and 69 in 2005. In the meantime, the figure went down, up and back down again, showing no clear overall trend. This was despite a 72% increase in cycle use over the period.
On average just under 18% of cyclists ran red lights, whereas over a third of motorists encroached into cyclists’ “Advance Stop Lines” (cycle boxes at traffic lights). "
http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/Press_Archive/Share_the_Road1.doc