A topic of discussion that crops up regularly is that of lights. There is such a bewildering variety available and new lights seem to appear on the market weekly. Now, we all know that manufacturers/retailers claims of lighting power varies from truthful to outright deceitful, so unless you have multiple lights available in front of you, it is impossible to compare them.
I've been thinking about this problem as of late and I would like to suggest a standardised method of comparison that we can use to compare them. Using a camera that allows full manual control, a pre-agreed set of camera settings can be used that allows us to compare photos of a light projection that are of equal EV (exposure values).
As a starting point, I suggest the following parameters:
Of these three parameters, the one that might prove tricky is the aperture. Cheap cameras tend to not support wide apertures. I have chosen f/5.6, as even with the cheapest of lenses, this value should be available at any reasonable focal length, on any camera that allows manual control. I have chosen the other two parameters to allow a reasonable range of luminosity (we are talking only artificial light sources, after all) to be recorded with a single EV.
This would only leave two variables; height of the light source and angle of projection. We could attempt to standardise these, but in the grand scheme of things, they shouldn't affect the final image too much, so we'd probably be better to keep things simple and not try to do so.
Finally, if not already obvious, light projections can only be captured on the horizontal plane (the ground). After all, a wall lit from close up would appear brighter than one lit from afar.
Does anyone have any thoughts about the proposed system, either generally, or specific issues?
I've been thinking about this problem as of late and I would like to suggest a standardised method of comparison that we can use to compare them. Using a camera that allows full manual control, a pre-agreed set of camera settings can be used that allows us to compare photos of a light projection that are of equal EV (exposure values).
As a starting point, I suggest the following parameters:
- Shutter speed: 1/60th second
- Aperture: f/5.6
- ISO: 1600
Of these three parameters, the one that might prove tricky is the aperture. Cheap cameras tend to not support wide apertures. I have chosen f/5.6, as even with the cheapest of lenses, this value should be available at any reasonable focal length, on any camera that allows manual control. I have chosen the other two parameters to allow a reasonable range of luminosity (we are talking only artificial light sources, after all) to be recorded with a single EV.
This would only leave two variables; height of the light source and angle of projection. We could attempt to standardise these, but in the grand scheme of things, they shouldn't affect the final image too much, so we'd probably be better to keep things simple and not try to do so.
Finally, if not already obvious, light projections can only be captured on the horizontal plane (the ground). After all, a wall lit from close up would appear brighter than one lit from afar.
Does anyone have any thoughts about the proposed system, either generally, or specific issues?
Last edited: