I have KT36/48-ZWSR , I don’t have a lcd for it how i can turn it on (ignition wire), and wiring the throttle
Throttle has three wires - 5v ( normally red), ground (normally black) and signal (white, blue most common, but can be any colour).I will use it for scooter , if you can please tell me how i can wiring throttle ?
signal wire how many volt if i can check it by multimeterThrottle has three wires - 5v ( normally red), ground (normally black) and signal (white, blue most common, but can be any colour).
When the throttle is shut, 1.2v, when fully open,3.8v, but only when you have a 5v supply on the black and red wires.signal wire how many volt if i can check it by multimeter
The torque simulation is a feature of the pedal assist, not the throttle. Without an LCD, pedal assist only works on level 1. If you want only throttle control, a £15 Ebay controller does it just as well.I thought KT controllers defaulted to TS aka current control, throttle would cover 0 to WOT and a scooter won't need PAS levels. Aside from the speed limit what best LCD features will he miss out on?
It depends on the software version, but, for most, when you select level 1 with a KT controller, you get level 1 power when you pedal, but if you continue to pedal and open the throttle, it jumps to level 5. If you don't pedal, the throttle acts as a speed controller.Not sure I understand, you're saying without an LCD the PAS level defaults to 1, giving max battery current = 13% of controller 'max' rating, and a wheel off the ground spins up to full speed when the pedals are turned, yes? What happens if you repeat that adding 50% throttle, do you get (up to) 100% current up to 50% of maximum speed and 13% current beyond that? That would be cool.
I've always been puzzled about the throttle implementation when it comes to KT controllers. If the throttle also operated as a current (torque) throttle, it would give a huge boost in usability and also make them more marketable too.If you don't pedal, the throttle acts as a speed controller.
Current control for throttles is probably a lot more difficult to program, and you don't really get any benefit on low powered systems. I think we can always dream of better control systems, but for a legal bike with adequate power, the KT controller works pretty well as it is. All I need is to be able to set the power approximately to the amount I want, then pedal along happily with the effort I want, and when there's a sudden need for more power (normally maximum), get it when I want, plus independent start assist for hills and when hampered by a shopping bag. The KT does all that legally. I just don't get why other controllers don't do that.I've always been puzzled about the throttle implementation when it comes to KT controllers. If the throttle also operated as a current (torque) throttle, it would give a huge boost in usability and also make them more marketable too.
KT controllers are definitely the best of all the 'budget' options available, but there's certainly room for improvement. The PID control required for torque throttle control is more complex than that needed for discreet fixed torque PAS levels. I've never tried the open source KT firmware, but I'm pretty sure it's been implemented there, so the processor should be capable enough.Current control for throttles is probably a lot more difficult to program, and you don't really get any benefit on low powered systems. I think we can always dream of better control systems, but for a legal bike with adequate power, the KT controller works pretty well as it is. All I need is to be able to set the power approximately to the amount I want, then pedal along happily with the effort I want, and when there's a sudden need for more power (normally maximum), get it when I want, plus independent start assist for hills and when hampered by a shopping bag. The KT does all that legally. I just don't get why other controllers don't do that.