Just a contrary opinion. Mine started failing in lots of different ways after the first year of heavy-ish commuting (5-10 miles a day in a quite hilly area). Over the following year I had to fix the following:
The chainring sheared away from the crank which meant I had to replace the entire drive chain as the cogs and chain had obviously worn.
The plastic seat insert cracked and failed.
Ditto the seat clamp
Fixing a puncture on the rear wheel is a serious pain in the backside. I can replace a tube on my mountain bike in 5 minutes, the brompton takes 40 mins as it requires dismantling of most of the rear gear system and getting the tire on/off the rim requires real ingenuity. For a commuter bike, you need to be to fix things quicker than that. I ended up using puncture proof gunk in the tube to avoid this.
Many of the parts are hardly premium either considering the price. Often you'll find steel and plastic and screws/rivets, rather than the alloy/hex bolts found on most other bikes eg brake levers, pedals, headsets.
In short, it feels like a typical British product in a way - fantastically designed, but a bit cheap on production.
I am not a heavy guy btw.
I do love the idea of the Brompton and enjoy riding it but it's not been the most reliable of rides for me. I should say, however, it's been a reliable occasional ride in the five years since I fixed the above.