My local paper had an article in it stating that the local police were going to do a free bike-stamping session on the following Saturday morning. Details of bikes were to be recorded so that they could be identified in the event of it being lost or stolen.
It seemed a good idea to get my expensive ProConnect stamped and registered on their computer database so off I went and queued-up with all the little kiddies with their bikes outside the police station.
The Community police officer used a Dremmel to scratch freehand the house number and postcode on the frame - so much for the bike-stamping as advertised! Stamping would have been a better way to mark the frame, scratching is more easily removed by a thief.
I gave my name, address and phone number. The paper I was handed stated that a photograph of the bike would be kept on the computer. There was no sign of a photographer and no photo was taken. We all got a free Halfords Combination bike lock for attending which I tried out when I got home. It wouldn't release with my chosen code - good job I hadn't used it on the bike. I wonder how many others used the lock on their bikes and then had to cut it off!
A few days ago a police officer phoned and asked my wife what the make, model and colour of the bike was. He said without this information the details wouldn't be added to the computer database. I was at work at the time and he wouldn't give my wife his phone number so that I could call him back later.
He hasn't called again so I guess my bike isn't recorded after all this.
Then I remembered the recent publicity about C.D. copies of databases that have gone missing and possibly ended up in criminal hands and thought that with the incompetance shown so far perhaps it is best I don't give them my bike details.
It seemed a good idea to get my expensive ProConnect stamped and registered on their computer database so off I went and queued-up with all the little kiddies with their bikes outside the police station.
The Community police officer used a Dremmel to scratch freehand the house number and postcode on the frame - so much for the bike-stamping as advertised! Stamping would have been a better way to mark the frame, scratching is more easily removed by a thief.
I gave my name, address and phone number. The paper I was handed stated that a photograph of the bike would be kept on the computer. There was no sign of a photographer and no photo was taken. We all got a free Halfords Combination bike lock for attending which I tried out when I got home. It wouldn't release with my chosen code - good job I hadn't used it on the bike. I wonder how many others used the lock on their bikes and then had to cut it off!
A few days ago a police officer phoned and asked my wife what the make, model and colour of the bike was. He said without this information the details wouldn't be added to the computer database. I was at work at the time and he wouldn't give my wife his phone number so that I could call him back later.
He hasn't called again so I guess my bike isn't recorded after all this.
Then I remembered the recent publicity about C.D. copies of databases that have gone missing and possibly ended up in criminal hands and thought that with the incompetance shown so far perhaps it is best I don't give them my bike details.