That's what I find confusing according to the 15194 standard it has this;
4.2.14 Maximum power measurement — Measurement at the engine shaft The maximum continuous rated power shall be measured according to EN 60034-1 when the motor reaches its thermal equilibrium as specified by the manufacturer
Looking at 60034-1 it's a pretty standard way of measuring duty cycles and continuous power as used on other products. Bosch for example sell the same motor as 250W or 350W depending on market but wouldn't the testing of the same motor be identical so why is one 250W and the other 350W. Same with other manufacturers, in other markets it appears a motor rated as 500W is now 250W in the European market. Why is the same motor not getting the same results?
I just don't get how the same physical motor can have lots of different wattage ratings.
So much easier to focus on the controller and how it controls power and wattage. I mean a Bosch controller is using something like 20-22A at 36V at continuous max power, easy to measure, easy to understand. Everyone can make simple comparisons with other ebike controllers.
A direct drive hub motor can operate from 200W to about 2500W with a suitable controller. Is it ok for a controller to limit output to 250W on the flat and unrestrict to 2500W on a hill? I just don't get the logic behind the legislation if its really allowing unlimited current for hill climbing. There is nothing in the certification about un-restricted power for hill climbing though. The graph on typical power characteristics is this which I accept is for flat ground;
View attachment 52232