I seem to remember seeing a TV programme about the early introduction of electric lighting in America. If memory serves, it was in the 30's that lamp munufacturers got together to discuss the fact that their lamps were lasting far too long and their profits were suffering. This resulted in a 2000 hour lifetime agreement. There was one company that rebelled but it was quickly taken over by the others. I believe it's called 'planned obsolescence'. It does make a kind of sense, a company must make enough profit to recoup R&D costs and fund new projects.
Perhaps I'm just a cynical old git who takes nothing at face value !
It's getting off topic,but as someone involved with the engineering in community,there is some truth in planned obsolescence.
The car industry designs and builds cars for the first owner. Not the second or third . They will build parts with sufficient longitivity to last beyond the warranty period. This was 1 to 3 year,and then the Koreans went and made a 6 year warranty a sales pitch
. The aircraft industry and other professional products designs and builds products for a 50 plus year lifetime . The differences being that it becomes much more expensive to build these products .. a car will have spot welds , glued and crimped fasteners and inaccessible voids,which can rust. A plane or a railway carriage will have almost everything demountable and replaceable. These industries then expect to have a lively after sales market in spare parts.
Getting back to incandescents, .. the most expensive element was the little bit of tungsten,so by making it thinner and in a triple helix, they could maximise luminance,while minimising electrical power and materials. The price of which is a highly predicable lifetime