Hello all, lovely to be here.
I have this big heavy bike which I think came from Germany and seems to be very well-suited to riding around in comfort on mostly flat plains.

However, I live in Pitlochry, which is far from flat. This, specifically, is the route that I wish to use to take my aged, 72kg body up the hill to my even more aged parents:

(the 48% gradient is the steepest bit and is probably an exaggeration, but it is pretty hellish in places)
I figure, though, that that bike would make a nice comfy pedelec, having front and rear suspension and a 7-speed internally geared hub.
I will state right now that I have no interest in going faster than 25km/h - or, frankly, going anywhere else - I'll be happy just to get up that hill without getting off and pushing, and without arriving at my parents' house looking like a bit of sweaty lettuce. In fact, if the thing had to be geared to give peak efficiency at only-just-fast-enough-so-that-I-can-stay-upright, that would be sufficient. The way down is easy - if I'm feeling brave I can pretty much get all the way down without pedalling.
From reading this forum and applying a bit of engineering common sense, a hub motor is not going to be very happy with those hills, so it'll be a mid-drive motor, with the hub gears helping the motor.
The SRAM-S7 IHG effectively has between 10.3 and 31.4 teeth on the rear sprocket, with its current 18t cog - I might consider getting a larger one for higher maximum torque if it appears necessary, and sacrifice my top speed (both motorised and leg-powered).
So the idea is that I will be in a super-low gear pretty much all the way up, with the motor spinning the chainring pretty fast.
Questions - with a mid-drive motor, does the chainring only ever spin at the speed of the cranks? Even though the motor will be doing the pushing, pedalling with a high cadence will still be far from ideal. I can imagine that it would be possible to have a torque sensor system that didn't "tie" the cranks to the chainring, but I can also imagine that that would be complex and would not really be how torque sensors are intended to work anyway. A system that tried to spin the chainring at a multiple of the speed of the cranks would be nice; or gave current as a function of cadence (or even applied torque), that sort of thing. Can mid-drive motors work like this - like the "primitive" cadence-sensing system of hub motors?
Questions - I have never ridden with a speedo, but I can cycle pretty slowly (sorry if that sounds like bragging ;-) ). Is it possible that the "walk throttle" - moving the bike at 4mph(?) - will get me up that hill without pedalling - do you think one can cycle that slowly and stay upright? What's your *minimum* cycling speed up a hill? Is a walk throttle a true throttle, or just an on/off switch?
Question - I am aware that the 250W power limit is about rated continuous power, and that some motors are ... helpfully conservative in their rating. If there was a mid-drive kit that could handle significantly more than that at peak while still being legal in their rating, then that would be very helpful. Suggestions?
(IMHO, speed limit = good, power limit = bad, but I'm sure that that discussion has been done to death in these forums)
I suppose at the end of the day I will just have to put up with whatever I can get (at the moment I'm thinking of the cheapest tongsheng unit), but I'd be interested in hearing any thoughts or advice.
The keen-eyed reader will see that it has a backpedal brake. AIUI, the mid-drive motor will render this useless. This pleases me greatly, as I hate it. Will I actually be able to pedal backwards without the chainring rotating backwards and activating the brake?
It might also be felt that the crossbar is rather high for that seat position. It is. I will consider getting myself a steel codpiece or a pair of platform shoes, or both....
Thanks for reading my not-so-little story, looking forward to joining your community and getting my cycling (and tinkering) confidence back,
Ian
I have this big heavy bike which I think came from Germany and seems to be very well-suited to riding around in comfort on mostly flat plains.

However, I live in Pitlochry, which is far from flat. This, specifically, is the route that I wish to use to take my aged, 72kg body up the hill to my even more aged parents:

(the 48% gradient is the steepest bit and is probably an exaggeration, but it is pretty hellish in places)
I figure, though, that that bike would make a nice comfy pedelec, having front and rear suspension and a 7-speed internally geared hub.
I will state right now that I have no interest in going faster than 25km/h - or, frankly, going anywhere else - I'll be happy just to get up that hill without getting off and pushing, and without arriving at my parents' house looking like a bit of sweaty lettuce. In fact, if the thing had to be geared to give peak efficiency at only-just-fast-enough-so-that-I-can-stay-upright, that would be sufficient. The way down is easy - if I'm feeling brave I can pretty much get all the way down without pedalling.
From reading this forum and applying a bit of engineering common sense, a hub motor is not going to be very happy with those hills, so it'll be a mid-drive motor, with the hub gears helping the motor.
The SRAM-S7 IHG effectively has between 10.3 and 31.4 teeth on the rear sprocket, with its current 18t cog - I might consider getting a larger one for higher maximum torque if it appears necessary, and sacrifice my top speed (both motorised and leg-powered).
So the idea is that I will be in a super-low gear pretty much all the way up, with the motor spinning the chainring pretty fast.
Questions - with a mid-drive motor, does the chainring only ever spin at the speed of the cranks? Even though the motor will be doing the pushing, pedalling with a high cadence will still be far from ideal. I can imagine that it would be possible to have a torque sensor system that didn't "tie" the cranks to the chainring, but I can also imagine that that would be complex and would not really be how torque sensors are intended to work anyway. A system that tried to spin the chainring at a multiple of the speed of the cranks would be nice; or gave current as a function of cadence (or even applied torque), that sort of thing. Can mid-drive motors work like this - like the "primitive" cadence-sensing system of hub motors?
Questions - I have never ridden with a speedo, but I can cycle pretty slowly (sorry if that sounds like bragging ;-) ). Is it possible that the "walk throttle" - moving the bike at 4mph(?) - will get me up that hill without pedalling - do you think one can cycle that slowly and stay upright? What's your *minimum* cycling speed up a hill? Is a walk throttle a true throttle, or just an on/off switch?
Question - I am aware that the 250W power limit is about rated continuous power, and that some motors are ... helpfully conservative in their rating. If there was a mid-drive kit that could handle significantly more than that at peak while still being legal in their rating, then that would be very helpful. Suggestions?
(IMHO, speed limit = good, power limit = bad, but I'm sure that that discussion has been done to death in these forums)
I suppose at the end of the day I will just have to put up with whatever I can get (at the moment I'm thinking of the cheapest tongsheng unit), but I'd be interested in hearing any thoughts or advice.
The keen-eyed reader will see that it has a backpedal brake. AIUI, the mid-drive motor will render this useless. This pleases me greatly, as I hate it. Will I actually be able to pedal backwards without the chainring rotating backwards and activating the brake?
It might also be felt that the crossbar is rather high for that seat position. It is. I will consider getting myself a steel codpiece or a pair of platform shoes, or both....
Thanks for reading my not-so-little story, looking forward to joining your community and getting my cycling (and tinkering) confidence back,
Ian